Mary Ziegler
banner
maryrziegler.bsky.social
Mary Ziegler
@maryrziegler.bsky.social

Historian, Law Professor, Guggenheim Fellow, 7 books, including Personhood and Roe: The History of a National Obsession. Bylines in the NYT, Atlantic, CNN, MSNBC, and Slate.

Mary R. Ziegler is an American legal scholar. She is the Martin Luther King Jr. Professor of Law at the University of California, Davis School of Law.

Source: Wikipedia
Political science 59%
Law 9%

Not presumptuous at all! Will look forward to reading. :)

Writing a piece on the history and current use of the idea of "biological sex" with Reva Siegel now--check out what it's doing below. The idea is playing a major role in these cases--and in the Court's potential rethinking of sex discrimination writ large. Stay tuned for more on that!
NEW: On the shadow docket, the Supreme Court lets Trump resume misgendering trans Americans on their passports, claiming "the government is merely attesting to a historical fact without subjecting anyone to differential treatment." All three liberals dissent. www.documentcloud.org/documents/26...
NEW: On the shadow docket, the Supreme Court lets Trump resume misgendering trans Americans on their passports, claiming "the government is merely attesting to a historical fact without subjecting anyone to differential treatment." All three liberals dissent. www.documentcloud.org/documents/26...

This will also delay resolution of the issue, which may suit the Trump Administration, while leaving open the possibility that the judge to whom the case is transferred will buy the arguments about the Comstock Act and FDA authority.
NEW: Judge Matt Kacsmaryk transferred ongoing lawsuit against the FDA over abortion drug mifepristone to the Eastern District of Missouri. (Trump DOJ said AGs of Missouri, Kansas, Idaho couldn't sue in TX.) Denies motions to intervene from AGs of TX, FL, LA
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
NEW: Judge Matt Kacsmaryk transferred ongoing lawsuit against the FDA over abortion drug mifepristone to the Eastern District of Missouri. (Trump DOJ said AGs of Missouri, Kansas, Idaho couldn't sue in TX.) Denies motions to intervene from AGs of TX, FL, LA
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

Two more important things: 1) this suit is meant to get a federal court to finally interpret the Comstock Act as a ban/ force a response from SCOTUS and Trump; 2) it reinforces arguments for fetal personhood (note that is a class action on behalf of all "fathers of unborn children")
We were long promised that cross-border wars over abortion would center on wrongful death suits brought by men. This may be the start, in a suit filed by Jonathan Mitchell. Why is this a big deal?

It may feel like it's not because the TX state suit and Louisiana prosecution didn't go anywhere. /1

Courts in NY or CA were never going to enter antiabortion judgments. The goal? Win in federal court and force compliance. As far as that goes, there are strategic advantages to a civil wrongful death suit brought by a private citizen. Don't sleep on what this means for abortion-protective states.

We were long promised that cross-border wars over abortion would center on wrongful death suits brought by men. This may be the start, in a suit filed by Jonathan Mitchell. Why is this a big deal?

It may feel like it's not because the TX state suit and Louisiana prosecution didn't go anywhere. /1

Medina on its own will likely harder for plaintiffs to enforce other civil rights in federal court. And as far as reproductive health is concerned, this case could be part of a one-two punch if Trump's Big Beautiful Bill passes.
And, predictably, in Medina, Justice Thomas isn't content to axe Planned Parenthood from Medicaid.

He would go further ... "to reexamine more broadly this Court’s §1983 jurisprudence . . . ."

This is an invitation to undermine a major foundation of civil rights litigation.

Reposted by Mary Ziegler

And, predictably, in Medina, Justice Thomas isn't content to axe Planned Parenthood from Medicaid.

He would go further ... "to reexamine more broadly this Court’s §1983 jurisprudence . . . ."

This is an invitation to undermine a major foundation of civil rights litigation.

Skrmetti caps off decades of movement work to rethink sex discrimination jurisprudence across the board. The goal was to ensure law could regulate based on biological difference, broadly defined --as one ADF attorney explained, to show that “one cannot deny the reality of biological sex.”
Look at how much work the Court's abortion cases do here. The majority cites Dobbs to say that regulating a medical condition/procedure isn't sex discrimination, and another abortion case, Gonzales v. Carhart, to suggest that legislatures deserve discretion when there is scientific uncertainty.
BREAKING: Supreme Court upholds Tennessee ban on transgender youth medical care
www.nbcnews.com/politics/sup...

Reposted by Ameet Sarpatwari

Look at how much work the Court's abortion cases do here. The majority cites Dobbs to say that regulating a medical condition/procedure isn't sex discrimination, and another abortion case, Gonzales v. Carhart, to suggest that legislatures deserve discretion when there is scientific uncertainty.

Reposted by Ameet Sarpatwari

BREAKING: Supreme Court upholds Tennessee ban on transgender youth medical care
www.nbcnews.com/politics/sup...
Supreme Court upholds Tennessee ban on transgender youth medical care
The ruling is a major setback for transgender rights, with more than 20 states enacting laws similar to Tennessee’s.
www.nbcnews.com

Striking story: a man accused of putting abortion pills into his girlfriend's drink without her consent is being charged not with criminal abortion or reproductive coercion but with capital murder in Texas. A test for personhood politics in the state.

www.star-telegram.com/news/local/c...
North Texas man accused of slipping abortion drug in pregnant girlfriend’s drink
A U.S. Department of Justice employee faces charges including capital murder after investigators say he forced an abortion by sneaking medication into a woman’s coffee.
www.star-telegram.com

The strategy in this case, involving what movement members call a guardian for the unborn, has been a defining strategy for fetal personhood since the 1960s. There are more federal personhood cases in the pipeline like this one in MN: www.mprnews.org/story/2024/1...

Good point

The thrust: hospitals didn't know what to do because of Biden. The Trump Admin vows to enforce the law to prevent serious harm to "the health of a pregnant woman or her unborn child."
No guidance about how hospitals should, but a clear nod to the idea that the unborn child counts as a patient too.

The study designed to give Trump a chance to revisit the rules governing mifepristone wasn't isolated. Here's the sequel; we'll see if it prompts HHS to end telehealth access. lozierinstitute.org/the-origins-...
The Origins and Proliferation of Unfounded Comparisons Regarding the Safety of Mifepristone - Lozier Institute
Abstract As part of the substantial public discourse surrounding the distribution and use of mifepristone, which is used with misoprostol to facilitate drug-induced abortions, claims comparing the saf...
lozierinstitute.org

Do you have the PDF? When I try the links from the MO courts? I get this error message from the link

Anyone have a copy of the MO Supreme Court order from yesterday, and Judge Zhang's February ruling? The MO courts page seems to be down?

Huge news. This bill was heralded as a model for other states. My guess is that it was taken down by its language blocking state courts from ruling on its constitutionality. Don't be surprised if many of these proposals are back, in TX and elsewhere, minus that idea.
A TX bill to let private citizens sue people who mail abortion pills into the state WON'T pass after missing a key deadline.

It's a loss for the state's anti-abortion movement. The bill had been cited as a possible model for other ban states.

I spoke to anti-abortion activists about what's next.
A Texas bill to block abortion pills has died for now
Senate Bill 2880, which supporters hoped could halt a key source of abortion, will likely not get a vote before the end of the session.
19thnews.org

Reposted by Mary Ziegler

A TX bill to let private citizens sue people who mail abortion pills into the state WON'T pass after missing a key deadline.

It's a loss for the state's anti-abortion movement. The bill had been cited as a possible model for other ban states.

I spoke to anti-abortion activists about what's next.
A Texas bill to block abortion pills has died for now
Senate Bill 2880, which supporters hoped could halt a key source of abortion, will likely not get a vote before the end of the session.
19thnews.org

Reposted by Mary Ziegler

The GA AG claims that Adriana Smith doesn't have to be kept on life support because taking her off wouldn't qualify as a "direct abortion" and violate the state's ban. But that's wrong because GA's law is a *fetal personhood* law. Want to learn more? I have a book!

www.amazon.com/Personhood-N...

AP's reporting on GA may confuse readers. It says pro-lifers are divided on personhood bills. That's true of bills authorizing punishment of women but NOT of the idea of personhood, which is what is driving events in Georgia. This isn't an outlier.
apnews.com/article/preg...
Case of brain-dead pregnant woman kept on life support in Georgia raises tricky questions
The case of a pregnant woman in Georgia who was declared brain dead and has been on life support for three months has given rise to complicated questions about abortion law and whether a fetus is a pe...
apnews.com

"Investigation" into mifepristone has been a defining policy. At first, this was a way to buy time, given that the abortion issue hurts Republicans. Now it looks like political cover. Trump's past talk of state's rights will be portrayed as sincere; he will say that new data have changed his mind.
During today's HHS budget hearing, Hawley brought up that junk science report & asked RFK if he believes this is reason enough to restrict access to the abortion pill mifepristone.

RFK: “The new data... it’s alarming & clearly it indicates that at very least that the label should be changed."

Reposted by Mary Ziegler

To be clear, it’s not that there are five votes to *uphold* Trump’s patently unlawful and unconstitutional limits on birthright citizenship; it’s that there seem to be five votes to hold that district courts can grant relief only to plaintiffs—so the policy would go into effect against all others.

Reposted by Mary Ziegler

During today's HHS budget hearing, Hawley brought up that junk science report & asked RFK if he believes this is reason enough to restrict access to the abortion pill mifepristone.

RFK: “The new data... it’s alarming & clearly it indicates that at very least that the label should be changed."