Reposted by Rusa ୧ ‧₊˚ 🍮 ⋅ ☆
#Jilco
Part 2 of the previous video
An animators brother called him to ask about the sexual tension in the lap sitting scene
Also has a bit of the guys being squicked by the idea of the ship
Part 2 of the previous video
An animators brother called him to ask about the sexual tension in the lap sitting scene
Also has a bit of the guys being squicked by the idea of the ship
January 10, 2025 at 6:43 PM
#Jilco
Part 2 of the previous video
An animators brother called him to ask about the sexual tension in the lap sitting scene
Also has a bit of the guys being squicked by the idea of the ship
Part 2 of the previous video
An animators brother called him to ask about the sexual tension in the lap sitting scene
Also has a bit of the guys being squicked by the idea of the ship
Reposted by Rusa ୧ ‧₊˚ 🍮 ⋅ ☆
#Jilco
Once again THE SUBTEXT IS THERE!
Riot said no to it being overt and/or stated canonically, and even this animator is glad it was shot down in the end because it squicks him...
BUT YES IT WAS INTENDED AS SEXUAL TENSION!
That's there, in the show!
Once again THE SUBTEXT IS THERE!
Riot said no to it being overt and/or stated canonically, and even this animator is glad it was shot down in the end because it squicks him...
BUT YES IT WAS INTENDED AS SEXUAL TENSION!
That's there, in the show!
January 10, 2025 at 6:43 PM
#Jilco
Once again THE SUBTEXT IS THERE!
Riot said no to it being overt and/or stated canonically, and even this animator is glad it was shot down in the end because it squicks him...
BUT YES IT WAS INTENDED AS SEXUAL TENSION!
That's there, in the show!
Once again THE SUBTEXT IS THERE!
Riot said no to it being overt and/or stated canonically, and even this animator is glad it was shot down in the end because it squicks him...
BUT YES IT WAS INTENDED AS SEXUAL TENSION!
That's there, in the show!