And to meet the requirements of stakeholders who did not have the same safety concerns as the end users.

Update: Rumi was mostly safe, because the desire to dissolve into the One is much more Lao Tzu than progressive delivery. Whew!

Now to fall asleep listening to a story about a shipwreck caused by pushing the boundaries of safety without taking into account possible exceptional states...

Excuse me, I need to update my personal style guide to use this citation method:

Thank you! I know what I'm doing tomorrow morning!

Our book that released last week!!!

progressivedelivery.com

Or I might be adding to the compost pile for the next book.

I swear, we did so much research writing this book, and we missed so much else.

For which the solutions are buy vs build, prototyping, [progressive delivery], and great designers.

If you're trying to remember who Brooks is, he's the Mythical Man-Month author.

That's right, Fred Brooks said in 1987 that automatic programming, AI, graphical programming, and workstations are not going to be the silver bullet for our problems. Because our real problems are complexity, [adoption], changeability, and invisibility.

When you read the Progressive Delivery book, you may notice... themes. I'm not saying we put mutual aid, climate change, and the social model of disability in our technology book... but it does end with Stone Soup.

You should read it. Or The Infernal Machine.

also, there are plenty of text to speech tools that just record and don't analyze and they've existed for nearly my entire life. we've got to stop allowing people to conflate direct, non-generative tools with genAI when they have a financial incentive to do so

(yes, I had to look it up)