The first Congress massively subsidized newspapers—the Post Office was established with newspaper distribution in mind, and the founders believed that the fed govt needed to take affirmative action to ensure freedom of speech and of the press

The problem isn’t the Nazis she’s hanging out with, it’s all the anti-Nazis who aren’t hanging out with the Nazis she’s hanging out with.

I blame the Nazi site’s owner and primary content creators, not the people who are not on the site. Like come on. My god.

Ah yes, post-9/11 America, that time and place where you definitely weren’t allowed to call people terrorists.

*ehem* come on, baby

a natural outgrowth of the various strains of conservative thought these days: anti-state, anti-public and pro-eugenics

Also a deduction is not a credit! This is so much worse that private insurance, which itself is bad.

Go ahead then, show us where German people worried about tidal waves hitting nuclear plants

This whole so-called “parents rights” movement the right has taken up and the left is supposed to kowtow to for votes is so obviously anti-child it really bothers me to see it presented as anything other than justification for abusive “parenting” and disregard for actual science on child development

youtu.be/ewaPkrLIZ9o?...

“No evidence the intent went beyond freeing slaves” — the framers of the amendment openly stated that it would grant citizenship to the children of Chinese immigrants. It’s in the Congressional record. Cited extensively in Wong Kim Ark. These aren’t obscure sources, especially for law professors.

There was extensive documented debate at the time 14A was drafted as to whether it would apply to Chinese railroad workers and gold rush workers' children. The answer was unequivocally that yes, it did. (5/3)