From the outside looking in, the whole idea of presidential pardons seems like an affront to the little democracy there is. You say 'no kings' but the UK has a king, and there'd be uproar if he had the power to override the law courts in this manner.

Legitimately curious what percentage of DJT’s life has been spent in front of a television.

That’s why I’m admitting I’m wrong instead of digging a further hole. Seems the dignified thing to do.

Understood. it’s possible to misread on my part and appreciate what you’re doing.

To say the NYTimes is not thinking when they put out drivel like —-/ this… is to ignore the fact that this drivel is designed specifically to not dig in to real issues that the billionaire class wants us to ignore. This drivel is put out by the NYTs’ billionaire masters.

Gives them too much credit tbh - they are thinking about their billionaire masters

There really is no reason that presidents should be able to pardon anyone. Congress --- sure... there are at least some checks on that power... but a sole executive... no... that's a stupid fucking rule.

Schatz really been listening to Ezra Klein's abundance bs too much and it really fucking shows.

NYC has a lot of pretty people, but LA has A LOT of pretty people.

Miller really thinks the issue is messaging when the issue is actual content. Such dumb shit.

Find someone who is obsessed with you like the NYTimes is obsessed with terrible rich white women who like to fuck conservative men.