Isn’t that just the authors saying they don’t think teaching kids to be respectful is a “legitimate curricular objective”?
Seems like a value judgement dressed up as a legal argument
Isn’t that just the authors saying they don’t think teaching kids to be respectful is a “legitimate curricular objective”?
Seems like a value judgement dressed up as a legal argument
Would the argument in the brief also prevent schools from banning the use of an anti-semitic slur (e.g. "k*ke")?
If not, what is the distinction being made?
Would the argument in the brief also prevent schools from banning the use of an anti-semitic slur (e.g. "k*ke")?
If not, what is the distinction being made?
"an accurate description of the Ryan plan, struck those voters as so cartoonishly evil that they found the charge implausible. (“[T]he respondents simply refused to believe any politician would do such a thing.”)"
"an accurate description of the Ryan plan, struck those voters as so cartoonishly evil that they found the charge implausible. (“[T]he respondents simply refused to believe any politician would do such a thing.”)"