Tom
@tom-s11.bsky.social
Masked as in Covid times? Is that standard practice just out of precaution in case all these people catch a bug?
November 30, 2025 at 8:59 AM
Masked as in Covid times? Is that standard practice just out of precaution in case all these people catch a bug?
Reposted by Tom
The thing about right wing deregulation is somehow it is always about making it easier to drill for oil in national parks and never about making it a bit easier to build housing or connections to solar farms
November 30, 2025 at 12:43 AM
The thing about right wing deregulation is somehow it is always about making it easier to drill for oil in national parks and never about making it a bit easier to build housing or connections to solar farms
Her own self indulgence and absolutely nothing else
November 29, 2025 at 7:26 PM
Her own self indulgence and absolutely nothing else
Got it, thank you!! That seems a bit, regressive...?
November 26, 2025 at 11:50 PM
Got it, thank you!! That seems a bit, regressive...?
This is all a bit over my head. If you earn 40k and make a 5.5% (£2200) contribution, you would pay 8% of £200, or £16 a year.
If you earned 60k and made the same % contribution (£3300), you would pay 2% of £1300, or £26 a year?
Have i got this right? Thank you Bluesky!
If you earned 60k and made the same % contribution (£3300), you would pay 2% of £1300, or £26 a year?
Have i got this right? Thank you Bluesky!
November 26, 2025 at 11:44 PM
This is all a bit over my head. If you earn 40k and make a 5.5% (£2200) contribution, you would pay 8% of £200, or £16 a year.
If you earned 60k and made the same % contribution (£3300), you would pay 2% of £1300, or £26 a year?
Have i got this right? Thank you Bluesky!
If you earned 60k and made the same % contribution (£3300), you would pay 2% of £1300, or £26 a year?
Have i got this right? Thank you Bluesky!
Reposted by Tom
This is really wild stuff tbh
November 25, 2025 at 7:53 PM
This is really wild stuff tbh
Where is there any confirmation of 'signing' the revised version? All I've seen is an unnamed Ukr official quoted saying they support the 'essence' of the revised plan with key issues to be discussed at presidential level. That's quite a distance from a signed deal
November 25, 2025 at 3:09 PM
Where is there any confirmation of 'signing' the revised version? All I've seen is an unnamed Ukr official quoted saying they support the 'essence' of the revised plan with key issues to be discussed at presidential level. That's quite a distance from a signed deal
Reposted by Tom
Trump’s rehabilitation of Putin sends the message to others that if you bully your neighbours you will be rewarded with propaganda wins like the red carpet treatment he gave Putin. You may even be rewarded with new territory & the ability to meddle in other nation’s constitution
November 21, 2025 at 10:17 PM
Trump’s rehabilitation of Putin sends the message to others that if you bully your neighbours you will be rewarded with propaganda wins like the red carpet treatment he gave Putin. You may even be rewarded with new territory & the ability to meddle in other nation’s constitution
Reposted by Tom
Those who say Trump is doing something where others sat on the sidelines, sure, but since he’s been president, attacks on Ukraine have only increased - dramatically so. Putin couldn’t even keep a lid on it during the bizarre bro-fest in Alaska, bombs literally fell as they met
November 21, 2025 at 10:14 PM
Those who say Trump is doing something where others sat on the sidelines, sure, but since he’s been president, attacks on Ukraine have only increased - dramatically so. Putin couldn’t even keep a lid on it during the bizarre bro-fest in Alaska, bombs literally fell as they met
Reposted by Tom
Cosmic fucking horror
November 19, 2025 at 12:16 PM
Cosmic fucking horror
Thank you, took a far amount of googling and trawling through .gov but that seems to be correct! Personally i'd support AS working much sooner to encourage integration, contributing to society, mental health benefits etc. But glad to see that arbitrary cut off doesnt exist (yet...)
November 17, 2025 at 11:24 PM
Thank you, took a far amount of googling and trawling through .gov but that seems to be correct! Personally i'd support AS working much sooner to encourage integration, contributing to society, mental health benefits etc. But glad to see that arbitrary cut off doesnt exist (yet...)
Does this mean that if an asylum claim is granted, they can then continue to work? Or just that they can continue to work while the application is processed up until the point asylum is granted?
If the latter, then surely it would unnecessarily stop people from working/paying tax/integrating?
If the latter, then surely it would unnecessarily stop people from working/paying tax/integrating?
November 17, 2025 at 11:05 PM
Does this mean that if an asylum claim is granted, they can then continue to work? Or just that they can continue to work while the application is processed up until the point asylum is granted?
If the latter, then surely it would unnecessarily stop people from working/paying tax/integrating?
If the latter, then surely it would unnecessarily stop people from working/paying tax/integrating?