www.youtube.com/watch?v=dT_B...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=dT_B...
"You are better off running your own model on a private dataset, so that the content won't be stolen by corporations."
Also advice from tech experts:
"You can't run your own model, because GPUs and memory are no longer obtainable, thanks to the AI bubble."
"You are better off running your own model on a private dataset, so that the content won't be stolen by corporations."
Also advice from tech experts:
"You can't run your own model, because GPUs and memory are no longer obtainable, thanks to the AI bubble."
(And no, this is not biting sarcasm about diverging opinions. I sincerely mean this.)
(And no, this is not biting sarcasm about diverging opinions. I sincerely mean this.)
Of course not.
Of course not.
These articles are night and day.
These articles are night and day.
"Play it, Steve."
Rest in Peace.
"Play it, Steve."
Rest in Peace.
It doesn't matter where his foot was if he didn't have control of the ball; it only matters where the ball was when he regained control.
It _might_ be technically wrong, but man if they had ruled that a fumble and touchback, all of college football would have lost their minds.
It doesn't matter where his foot was if he didn't have control of the ball; it only matters where the ball was when he regained control.
It _might_ be technically wrong, but man if they had ruled that a fumble and touchback, all of college football would have lost their minds.
It _might_ be technically wrong, but man if they had ruled that a fumble and touchback, all of college football would have lost their minds.
theintercept.com/2025/11/17/p...
(Did I mention here that I broke my hip back in August?)
(Did I mention here that I broke my hip back in August?)
One of the announcers even said that the receiver had control of the ball before he was down.
One of the announcers even said that the receiver had control of the ball before he was down.
But history also shows us that, every now and then, the people who are complaining turn out to be right, and ignoring them was a terrible mistake.
“It is difficult to imagine a previous period when such an all-pervasive hopelessness was exhibited at all levels of British life” – Professor Stephen Haseler, 1975
But history also shows us that, every now and then, the people who are complaining turn out to be right, and ignoring them was a terrible mistake.
It is near the maximum theoretical limit of acceleration, but that's not surprising for an object that may have never been close to a star before.
It is near the maximum theoretical limit of acceleration, but that's not surprising for an object that may have never been close to a star before.
But why would a lawless administration listen to a judge?
jacquelinesweet.substack.com/p/fbi-inform...
But why would a lawless administration listen to a judge?
("Window Cleaning" was not a euphemism I was familiar with.)
("Window Cleaning" was not a euphemism I was familiar with.)
And it seems like an absolutely terrible idea. Doesn't just hurt "mega businesses". It hurts small business. Low income workers. The entire economy.
Who's behind this and why?
And it seems like an absolutely terrible idea. Doesn't just hurt "mega businesses". It hurts small business. Low income workers. The entire economy.
Who's behind this and why?
Though personally I prefer "The Brazilian Bailout Ballroom".
Though personally I prefer "The Brazilian Bailout Ballroom".