This is the negative version of "I want to live in a museum". Lol @ the full-sized statue on the kitchen island

Fuck this president. Idunno if I'm more upset at him, or disappointed that "regular" people voted this un-American garbage into office. What a shitshow we are becoming...

Getting rid of Section 230 would mean effectively that every social media platforms, web host and service that allowed comments would now revert to being a publisher in the older sense, and would be immediately liable for all content posted on their platform, whcih would mean…

So the *point* of Section 230 was to say the following:
• Individual social media platforms are not responsible for user generated content, the original poster is and they can be sued
• The individual platforms are able to moderate those spaces to moderate their platforms without being sued

The *other* thing was that it was considered risky for a company to allow *some* content and not others because that *in itself* might be viewed as comment that the statement was untrue and libelous, which *itself* might give the poster grounds to sue in turn for libel! - “you said I was a liar”

It’s very simple. Genuinely very simple. Until Section 230, it was the case that any website that allowed a user to publish any content of any kind could be sued if they said *anything* libelous or bad. That includes web hosts, blogging platforms, social media etc.

Inside the House GOP meeting, Jim Jordan (!) stood up and said Republicans need to pair an ACA subsidy extension with reforms. He warned that if they don't, centrist Rs and Ds will pass ACA by discharge petition with no conservative reforms. Per source with knowledge. www.nbcnews.com/politics/con...