https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:zvinwh7vy4tjegch2hxvopdd/feed/piracy
n.b. this was already the case for posts directly replying to banned users. these restrictions do not apply to replies/quotes by certified pirates.
n.b. this was already the case for posts directly replying to banned users. these restrictions do not apply to replies/quotes by certified pirates.
it took me long to admit it to myself but i didn't derive joy from it anymore, so i got rid of it. not much more to it
it took me long to admit it to myself but i didn't derive joy from it anymore, so i got rid of it. not much more to it
but if you're editing records then yeah, sidecar, i'd consider breaking cid links enough of a problem to avoid the other approach
but if you're editing records then yeah, sidecar, i'd consider breaking cid links enough of a problem to avoid the other approach
went through a bunch of my early posts and i'm not really seeing it tbh
went through a bunch of my early posts and i'm not really seeing it tbh
`||bsky.app/ipcc$replace=/(?<="countryCode":").+?(?=")/US/`
`||bsky.app/ipcc$replace=/(?<="isAgeRestrictedGeo":").+?(?=")/false/`
`||bsky.app/ipcc$replace=/(?<="countryCode":").+?(?=")/US/`
`||bsky.app/ipcc$replace=/(?<="isAgeRestrictedGeo":").+?(?=")/false/`
if Bluesky PBC wants to make users of non-policy-compliant appviews (e.g. zeppelin) invisible their only option is to make all third-party-PDS users invisible (probably making all their engineers resign), because they cannot tell which users are using which appviews
if Bluesky PBC wants to make users of non-policy-compliant appviews (e.g. zeppelin) invisible their only option is to make all third-party-PDS users invisible (probably making all their engineers resign), because they cannot tell which users are using which appviews