Zak Sitter
@telliamed.bsky.social
it's more spiders isn't it
November 21, 2025 at 11:47 AM
it's more spiders isn't it
It's very not bad.
November 19, 2025 at 11:21 AM
It's very not bad.
I fear the truth may be worse - someone thought this was artful.
November 18, 2025 at 2:00 AM
I fear the truth may be worse - someone thought this was artful.
Oh it did! He's a mental health advocate now. 🫣
November 16, 2025 at 11:34 PM
Oh it did! He's a mental health advocate now. 🫣
I mean, she's also said she's not running for that, but 🤷♂️
November 16, 2025 at 4:20 PM
I mean, she's also said she's not running for that, but 🤷♂️
What race are you thinking of? I thought she'd said she wasn't running for Senate, & her district is extremely safe.
November 16, 2025 at 4:13 PM
What race are you thinking of? I thought she'd said she wasn't running for Senate, & her district is extremely safe.
Mostly because of the complete vacuity of the institutionalist wing of their party, which could never happen to--well, hmm.
November 16, 2025 at 12:31 PM
Mostly because of the complete vacuity of the institutionalist wing of their party, which could never happen to--well, hmm.
Not enough muscles, it seems
November 15, 2025 at 2:47 PM
Not enough muscles, it seems
Her timing strongly suggests the former
November 15, 2025 at 12:49 PM
Her timing strongly suggests the former
My mom took me to see Return of the Secaucus 7 when I was 7 or 8. Been riding with John ever since.
November 15, 2025 at 11:14 AM
My mom took me to see Return of the Secaucus 7 when I was 7 or 8. Been riding with John ever since.
This is how they get us
November 13, 2025 at 1:09 AM
This is how they get us
DO NOT REPEAT THIS INSIGHT
November 12, 2025 at 6:23 PM
DO NOT REPEAT THIS INSIGHT
I feel some sympathy for Nico because Luka is a weenie and I don't enjoy watching him play, but also he is extremely good at basketball and that trade was beyond malpractice.
November 11, 2025 at 3:57 PM
I feel some sympathy for Nico because Luka is a weenie and I don't enjoy watching him play, but also he is extremely good at basketball and that trade was beyond malpractice.
Bad bets in general, or credulous bets on flimsy stocks?
November 11, 2025 at 8:05 AM
Bad bets in general, or credulous bets on flimsy stocks?
I dunno, the complaints of Republicans ca. 2007 were so fundamentally trivial (I know, not in their eyes, but whatevs) and those of contemporary non-Trumpists so clearly not that I find the analogy fundamentally unhelpful.
November 10, 2025 at 10:08 PM
I dunno, the complaints of Republicans ca. 2007 were so fundamentally trivial (I know, not in their eyes, but whatevs) and those of contemporary non-Trumpists so clearly not that I find the analogy fundamentally unhelpful.
Well then who *did* burn down the Supreme Court, and where can I sign up for their newsletter?
November 10, 2025 at 5:21 PM
Well then who *did* burn down the Supreme Court, and where can I sign up for their newsletter?
Are you saying that Dems shouldn't have caved on the shutdown because of the backlash it will produce among crankier Dems? So the way to prevent them from coalescing into a Tea Party-style cadre is to...give them what they want? Or do you mean something else by "last night was bad"?
November 10, 2025 at 5:12 PM
Are you saying that Dems shouldn't have caved on the shutdown because of the backlash it will produce among crankier Dems? So the way to prevent them from coalescing into a Tea Party-style cadre is to...give them what they want? Or do you mean something else by "last night was bad"?
He might; he's a much higher-variance candidate than Mills, who seems like a safe bet to lose respectably (and be 80).
November 10, 2025 at 5:07 PM
He might; he's a much higher-variance candidate than Mills, who seems like a safe bet to lose respectably (and be 80).
You control all three branches and lock in a SCOTUS majority for a generation?
I'm being facetious, but I'm honestly not sure what you think the lesson is here, even setting aside the fact that, unlike w/the Tea Party, these actually are unprecedented times.
I'm being facetious, but I'm honestly not sure what you think the lesson is here, even setting aside the fact that, unlike w/the Tea Party, these actually are unprecedented times.
November 10, 2025 at 2:50 PM
You control all three branches and lock in a SCOTUS majority for a generation?
I'm being facetious, but I'm honestly not sure what you think the lesson is here, even setting aside the fact that, unlike w/the Tea Party, these actually are unprecedented times.
I'm being facetious, but I'm honestly not sure what you think the lesson is here, even setting aside the fact that, unlike w/the Tea Party, these actually are unprecedented times.
It's like saying "there's no way Shaggy could fit that sandwich in his mouth, ergo supernatural!" The original show's formula was nonetheless that supposedly inhuman monsters were invariably unmasked as people in disguise.
November 10, 2025 at 7:11 AM
It's like saying "there's no way Shaggy could fit that sandwich in his mouth, ergo supernatural!" The original show's formula was nonetheless that supposedly inhuman monsters were invariably unmasked as people in disguise.
Yeesh, one vapid strawman after another. A talking dog is not a "supernatural element," just a basic misunderstanding of how genre works. I guess to the extent that there are people who see the show as "hyper realistic," they're obviously wrong, but jfc who thinks that?
November 10, 2025 at 7:08 AM
Yeesh, one vapid strawman after another. A talking dog is not a "supernatural element," just a basic misunderstanding of how genre works. I guess to the extent that there are people who see the show as "hyper realistic," they're obviously wrong, but jfc who thinks that?
She's 87; at that age, even switching detergent brands might be a bridge too far.
November 9, 2025 at 8:22 PM
She's 87; at that age, even switching detergent brands might be a bridge too far.