Zak Sitter
@telliamed.bsky.social
By a country mile:
youtu.be/orOmV8PpzKg?...
youtu.be/orOmV8PpzKg?...
October 16, 2025 at 12:28 AM
By a country mile:
youtu.be/orOmV8PpzKg?...
youtu.be/orOmV8PpzKg?...
This below is also very bad:
Their convictions weren't overturned b/c there was no DNA evidence linking them to the crimes (wtf? that doesn't even make sense on its face), but because there WAS DNA evidence linking SOMEONE ELSE to the crimes.
Their convictions weren't overturned b/c there was no DNA evidence linking them to the crimes (wtf? that doesn't even make sense on its face), but because there WAS DNA evidence linking SOMEONE ELSE to the crimes.
September 27, 2025 at 2:22 PM
This below is also very bad:
Their convictions weren't overturned b/c there was no DNA evidence linking them to the crimes (wtf? that doesn't even make sense on its face), but because there WAS DNA evidence linking SOMEONE ELSE to the crimes.
Their convictions weren't overturned b/c there was no DNA evidence linking them to the crimes (wtf? that doesn't even make sense on its face), but because there WAS DNA evidence linking SOMEONE ELSE to the crimes.
Somebody misread regime accountant's retweet of your tweet as being...ah, it's all so dumb
September 6, 2025 at 6:45 PM
Somebody misread regime accountant's retweet of your tweet as being...ah, it's all so dumb
Philly showed us the way
August 26, 2025 at 2:22 PM
Philly showed us the way
Someone at Reuters is having fun:
August 14, 2025 at 4:56 PM
Someone at Reuters is having fun:
If you see this, post a bad woman you love
August 12, 2025 at 1:54 AM
If you see this, post a bad woman you love
Or just read JCO's absolutely savage distillation of it
August 6, 2025 at 1:04 AM
Or just read JCO's absolutely savage distillation of it
A watershed in the history of sentence construction
August 4, 2025 at 2:22 PM
A watershed in the history of sentence construction
Explicitly accepting the definitions of sex in the "Defending Women from Gender Ideology and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government" executive order seems pretty bad (though obviously implementation is another matter):
July 31, 2025 at 12:23 PM
Explicitly accepting the definitions of sex in the "Defending Women from Gender Ideology and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government" executive order seems pretty bad (though obviously implementation is another matter):
Who is "you"? Who is determining vagueness and the threshold of investigation? This agreement requires Brown to submit all the documentation they collect to the feds, who are then free to decide what does & doesn't require further scrutiny.
July 31, 2025 at 2:12 AM
Who is "you"? Who is determining vagueness and the threshold of investigation? This agreement requires Brown to submit all the documentation they collect to the feds, who are then free to decide what does & doesn't require further scrutiny.
Universities already have processes for allegations of bias and harassment. Brown has an online form that's designed for this express purpose (& that includes language pointing out the difficulty of acting on anonymous complaints):
July 31, 2025 at 1:53 AM
Universities already have processes for allegations of bias and harassment. Brown has an online form that's designed for this express purpose (& that includes language pointing out the difficulty of acting on anonymous complaints):
Yeah, there's a clear rationale behind becoming a reporter (and "big newspaper" obviously implies city), but nothing about place at first. This is from 1948 (god, the Internet Archive is amazing):
July 28, 2025 at 2:27 PM
Yeah, there's a clear rationale behind becoming a reporter (and "big newspaper" obviously implies city), but nothing about place at first. This is from 1948 (god, the Internet Archive is amazing):
In fact, the first scenes we get of young Clark sure look more like Metropolis than Smallville (this is from Superman #1, 1939):
July 28, 2025 at 2:16 PM
In fact, the first scenes we get of young Clark sure look more like Metropolis than Smallville (this is from Superman #1, 1939):
Smallville really doesn't feature until about a decade in; Action Comics #1 doesn't even mention the Kents, just an orphanage. So I guess the question is really, why/when did they feel the need to backfill in the Smallville origin myth?
July 28, 2025 at 2:03 PM
Smallville really doesn't feature until about a decade in; Action Comics #1 doesn't even mention the Kents, just an orphanage. So I guess the question is really, why/when did they feel the need to backfill in the Smallville origin myth?
Wilde definitely, though I maybe not his trial in particular. By that time he, & aestheticism, had been widely celebrated & satirized for more than a decade. Gilbert & Sullivan even wrote a play about it! (Interestingly, they had the same manager as Wilde, who cashed in on the crossover.)
July 20, 2025 at 12:30 AM
Wilde definitely, though I maybe not his trial in particular. By that time he, & aestheticism, had been widely celebrated & satirized for more than a decade. Gilbert & Sullivan even wrote a play about it! (Interestingly, they had the same manager as Wilde, who cashed in on the crossover.)
"In cold blood" might be a bit much, but Law was probably insisting that because that's unambiguously what happened in the original version. Really, nobody who saw the original movie thought that Greedo shot first. And if you look at the screenplay, there's no suggestion otherwise.
July 12, 2025 at 5:27 PM
"In cold blood" might be a bit much, but Law was probably insisting that because that's unambiguously what happened in the original version. Really, nobody who saw the original movie thought that Greedo shot first. And if you look at the screenplay, there's no suggestion otherwise.