Teeklin
@teeklin.bsky.social
World record holder for most migraines.
Unfortunately no visions of the future. Yet.
Unfortunately no visions of the future. Yet.
Reposted by Teeklin
Neither Sherrill or Spanberger had a 2nd person from the Dem primary running in their general election races to split the vote.
And if you took the money the GOP spent in both their races and combined it, it was 1/5th the amount that was spent against Zohran.
And the NYT didn't trash them daily.
And if you took the money the GOP spent in both their races and combined it, it was 1/5th the amount that was spent against Zohran.
And the NYT didn't trash them daily.
November 13, 2025 at 7:19 AM
Neither Sherrill or Spanberger had a 2nd person from the Dem primary running in their general election races to split the vote.
And if you took the money the GOP spent in both their races and combined it, it was 1/5th the amount that was spent against Zohran.
And the NYT didn't trash them daily.
And if you took the money the GOP spent in both their races and combined it, it was 1/5th the amount that was spent against Zohran.
And the NYT didn't trash them daily.
Neither Sherrill or Spanberger had a 2nd person from the Dem primary running in their general election races to split the vote.
And if you took the money the GOP spent in both their races and combined it, it was 1/5th the amount that was spent against Zohran.
And the NYT didn't trash them daily.
And if you took the money the GOP spent in both their races and combined it, it was 1/5th the amount that was spent against Zohran.
And the NYT didn't trash them daily.
November 13, 2025 at 7:19 AM
Neither Sherrill or Spanberger had a 2nd person from the Dem primary running in their general election races to split the vote.
And if you took the money the GOP spent in both their races and combined it, it was 1/5th the amount that was spent against Zohran.
And the NYT didn't trash them daily.
And if you took the money the GOP spent in both their races and combined it, it was 1/5th the amount that was spent against Zohran.
And the NYT didn't trash them daily.
Yes.
If I see one more dogshit journalist say "had sex with an underage girl" instead of "raped a child" I might lose my fuckin mind
November 13, 2025 at 6:19 AM
Yes.
If anyone wants a laugh, listen to this fuckwit talk to Jon Stewart just a couple of weeks ago on his podcast about why the Dems not caving was good actually.
What an empty suit piece of shit.
What an empty suit piece of shit.
November 13, 2025 at 5:19 AM
If anyone wants a laugh, listen to this fuckwit talk to Jon Stewart just a couple of weeks ago on his podcast about why the Dems not caving was good actually.
What an empty suit piece of shit.
What an empty suit piece of shit.
No, I didn't take it as one. You have very valid points. I just don't see a way out of this without an actual leader that people can rally behind.
Someone who can bring transparency to the party in a way that restores trust while actually having a real vision for how the party needs to go forward.
Someone who can bring transparency to the party in a way that restores trust while actually having a real vision for how the party needs to go forward.
November 13, 2025 at 5:00 AM
No, I didn't take it as one. You have very valid points. I just don't see a way out of this without an actual leader that people can rally behind.
Someone who can bring transparency to the party in a way that restores trust while actually having a real vision for how the party needs to go forward.
Someone who can bring transparency to the party in a way that restores trust while actually having a real vision for how the party needs to go forward.
And millions of people wouldn't be doomed to fucking die without healthcare. Dems would still have leverage and momentum from their party. They would still have a chance to actually win next year. And all those people denied benefits for the past 40 days wouldn't fucking hate them with a passion.
November 13, 2025 at 4:59 AM
And millions of people wouldn't be doomed to fucking die without healthcare. Dems would still have leverage and momentum from their party. They would still have a chance to actually win next year. And all those people denied benefits for the past 40 days wouldn't fucking hate them with a passion.
Sure. But if he's not willing to do that then he's not a real leader and he should be gone anyway.
Nothing is going to really change until Democrats start putting their terrible colleagues on blast and going against them to get them out of these positions and replace them with public servants.
Nothing is going to really change until Democrats start putting their terrible colleagues on blast and going against them to get them out of these positions and replace them with public servants.
November 13, 2025 at 4:56 AM
Sure. But if he's not willing to do that then he's not a real leader and he should be gone anyway.
Nothing is going to really change until Democrats start putting their terrible colleagues on blast and going against them to get them out of these positions and replace them with public servants.
Nothing is going to really change until Democrats start putting their terrible colleagues on blast and going against them to get them out of these positions and replace them with public servants.
How will we ever see any real change or get any of these people only concerned with power and status out of these positions if it's not the leader cleaning house on this stuff?
November 13, 2025 at 4:52 AM
How will we ever see any real change or get any of these people only concerned with power and status out of these positions if it's not the leader cleaning house on this stuff?
Nothing you said is wrong, but as the leader it's on HIM to stop this stuff.
Why do we not have Schumer releasing recordings and texts from private chats with these Senators, calling them out for this power hungry greed and cowardice in public, and calling to fund challengers to replace them?
Why do we not have Schumer releasing recordings and texts from private chats with these Senators, calling them out for this power hungry greed and cowardice in public, and calling to fund challengers to replace them?
November 13, 2025 at 4:51 AM
Nothing you said is wrong, but as the leader it's on HIM to stop this stuff.
Why do we not have Schumer releasing recordings and texts from private chats with these Senators, calling them out for this power hungry greed and cowardice in public, and calling to fund challengers to replace them?
Why do we not have Schumer releasing recordings and texts from private chats with these Senators, calling them out for this power hungry greed and cowardice in public, and calling to fund challengers to replace them?
Cuellar who just voted with MAGA to end the shut down and also voted with MAGA to fuck over immigrants with Laken Riley.
Truly a dog shit representative
Truly a dog shit representative
November 13, 2025 at 1:48 AM
Cuellar who just voted with MAGA to end the shut down and also voted with MAGA to fuck over immigrants with Laken Riley.
Truly a dog shit representative
Truly a dog shit representative
The plan is for Democrats to oppose Trump and stop actively helping MAGA achieve their agenda while we try to mitigate the damage and win back Congress.
The problem is that Dems are MAGA-lite Republicans who are happy to actively help Trump achieve all his goals with no pushback whatsoever.
The problem is that Dems are MAGA-lite Republicans who are happy to actively help Trump achieve all his goals with no pushback whatsoever.
November 12, 2025 at 6:03 PM
The plan is for Democrats to oppose Trump and stop actively helping MAGA achieve their agenda while we try to mitigate the damage and win back Congress.
The problem is that Dems are MAGA-lite Republicans who are happy to actively help Trump achieve all his goals with no pushback whatsoever.
The problem is that Dems are MAGA-lite Republicans who are happy to actively help Trump achieve all his goals with no pushback whatsoever.
Tell me more about how the far left "misunderestimated" (lol) Trump. Certainly wasn't the shitlibs and Hilary Clinton doing a fucking victory lap instead of actually rallying votes, right? It wasn't the dogshit liberals saying that the left was overreacting by calling him a fascist and Nazi, eh?
November 12, 2025 at 3:58 PM
Tell me more about how the far left "misunderestimated" (lol) Trump. Certainly wasn't the shitlibs and Hilary Clinton doing a fucking victory lap instead of actually rallying votes, right? It wasn't the dogshit liberals saying that the left was overreacting by calling him a fascist and Nazi, eh?
Yes, please tell me how government works. Explain to me how Democrats just HAVE to vote with MAGA to pass Laken Riley and target immigrants. How they HAVE to vote to confirm Trump nominees to tear the country apart. How they HAVE to piss away all leverage and vote to support the GOP budget.
November 12, 2025 at 3:57 PM
Yes, please tell me how government works. Explain to me how Democrats just HAVE to vote with MAGA to pass Laken Riley and target immigrants. How they HAVE to vote to confirm Trump nominees to tear the country apart. How they HAVE to piss away all leverage and vote to support the GOP budget.
Lot of people a lot older than 45 reading this shit like, "Of course psychics are fake! Not like the imaginary person in the sky that I believe in!"
Seriously, ridiculing Kim for believing in psychics while the majority of this country believes in religion is just silly.
Seriously, ridiculing Kim for believing in psychics while the majority of this country believes in religion is just silly.
November 12, 2025 at 2:35 PM
Lot of people a lot older than 45 reading this shit like, "Of course psychics are fake! Not like the imaginary person in the sky that I believe in!"
Seriously, ridiculing Kim for believing in psychics while the majority of this country believes in religion is just silly.
Seriously, ridiculing Kim for believing in psychics while the majority of this country believes in religion is just silly.
If you walk into town square and start shouting about what you believe to everyone that walks by, some of those people might shout their own beliefs back.
If you don't want people to respond to your posts, Bluesky has a lot of ways to do that so you can post your thoughts without any pushback.
If you don't want people to respond to your posts, Bluesky has a lot of ways to do that so you can post your thoughts without any pushback.
November 12, 2025 at 1:00 PM
If you walk into town square and start shouting about what you believe to everyone that walks by, some of those people might shout their own beliefs back.
If you don't want people to respond to your posts, Bluesky has a lot of ways to do that so you can post your thoughts without any pushback.
If you don't want people to respond to your posts, Bluesky has a lot of ways to do that so you can post your thoughts without any pushback.
"Sorry NYC, I don't drunkly slur 30 year old red neck rap through my meth teeth for commies"
November 12, 2025 at 12:55 PM
"Sorry NYC, I don't drunkly slur 30 year old red neck rap through my meth teeth for commies"
Democrats in 2010: "We can't do anything guys. We only have 59 senators!"
Democrats in 2025: "We can't stop anything guys. They have 53 senators!"
jfc the shitlib urge to defend abject cowardice and incompetence...
When they lost the election their job was to be the fucking opposition
Democrats in 2025: "We can't stop anything guys. They have 53 senators!"
jfc the shitlib urge to defend abject cowardice and incompetence...
When they lost the election their job was to be the fucking opposition
November 12, 2025 at 12:51 PM
Democrats in 2010: "We can't do anything guys. We only have 59 senators!"
Democrats in 2025: "We can't stop anything guys. They have 53 senators!"
jfc the shitlib urge to defend abject cowardice and incompetence...
When they lost the election their job was to be the fucking opposition
Democrats in 2025: "We can't stop anything guys. They have 53 senators!"
jfc the shitlib urge to defend abject cowardice and incompetence...
When they lost the election their job was to be the fucking opposition
That's not at all what Bernie reps or progressive voters wanted lol
We aren't looking for a neutral Democratic party
We are looking for a DNC that supports progressive candidates instead of corporate shills
Their neutrality pledge was cowardice and surrender to capital labeled as compromise
We aren't looking for a neutral Democratic party
We are looking for a DNC that supports progressive candidates instead of corporate shills
Their neutrality pledge was cowardice and surrender to capital labeled as compromise
November 12, 2025 at 12:36 PM
That's not at all what Bernie reps or progressive voters wanted lol
We aren't looking for a neutral Democratic party
We are looking for a DNC that supports progressive candidates instead of corporate shills
Their neutrality pledge was cowardice and surrender to capital labeled as compromise
We aren't looking for a neutral Democratic party
We are looking for a DNC that supports progressive candidates instead of corporate shills
Their neutrality pledge was cowardice and surrender to capital labeled as compromise
I agree, their actions are indefensible and they are cowards.
I would lash out at random strangers online for pointing that out too if I felt a sycophantic need to defend politicians failing to do their fucking job on social media
I would lash out at random strangers online for pointing that out too if I felt a sycophantic need to defend politicians failing to do their fucking job on social media
November 12, 2025 at 5:40 AM
I agree, their actions are indefensible and they are cowards.
I would lash out at random strangers online for pointing that out too if I felt a sycophantic need to defend politicians failing to do their fucking job on social media
I would lash out at random strangers online for pointing that out too if I felt a sycophantic need to defend politicians failing to do their fucking job on social media
Saying "progressives are willing to spill others blood for our failures" when literally in this very discussion we are talking about them condemning tens of thousands of innocent people to death w/o healthcare with their abject failure to do their fucking job and not be cowards is WILD
November 12, 2025 at 5:33 AM
Saying "progressives are willing to spill others blood for our failures" when literally in this very discussion we are talking about them condemning tens of thousands of innocent people to death w/o healthcare with their abject failure to do their fucking job and not be cowards is WILD