Technology Phrases
@technologyphrases.bsky.social
Phrases in technology exist. he/him
“Is it? Go and buy it.”
“Sky-walk-ER!”
“Sky-walk-ER!”
December 25, 2025 at 1:49 PM
“Is it? Go and buy it.”
“Sky-walk-ER!”
“Sky-walk-ER!”
Got it, thanks
December 25, 2025 at 5:28 AM
Got it, thanks
Wasn’t the congress dot net cite documentation or a news report? I’m confused.
December 25, 2025 at 5:26 AM
Wasn’t the congress dot net cite documentation or a news report? I’m confused.
Reposted by Technology Phrases
This piece from LGBTQ Nation highlights WaPo's attempt (and failure) to push that narrative www.lgbtqnation.com/2025/12/frie...
Friends of accused Charlie Kirk shooter say he never talked about trans issues - LGBTQ Nation
A new report undercuts the Trump administration's anti-trans narrative around Kirk's assassination.
www.lgbtqnation.com
December 17, 2025 at 9:08 PM
This piece from LGBTQ Nation highlights WaPo's attempt (and failure) to push that narrative www.lgbtqnation.com/2025/12/frie...
Reposted by Technology Phrases
"He was also an alien smuggler," says the administration that is struggling to deport him to Africa precisely in order to avoid prosecuting him for this in a Tennessee court (after Bondi swore up and down that he'd face justice in the US)
bsky.app/profile/atru...
bsky.app/profile/atru...
Bovino on Abrego Garcia: "When he becomes deportable, he is going to get deported. And he needs to be deported now."
December 14, 2025 at 4:31 PM
"He was also an alien smuggler," says the administration that is struggling to deport him to Africa precisely in order to avoid prosecuting him for this in a Tennessee court (after Bondi swore up and down that he'd face justice in the US)
bsky.app/profile/atru...
bsky.app/profile/atru...
Reposted by Technology Phrases
Normal how? All the Democrats I know are normal. They’re decent, they support meaningful work, strong public schools, family integrity, affordable health care, prudent and fair taxation, value for tax money spent, racial & religious harmony, human dignity & human rights. Where’s the weird in that?
December 7, 2025 at 3:29 AM
Normal how? All the Democrats I know are normal. They’re decent, they support meaningful work, strong public schools, family integrity, affordable health care, prudent and fair taxation, value for tax money spent, racial & religious harmony, human dignity & human rights. Where’s the weird in that?
Reposted by Technology Phrases
i'm so tired of this. The centrist idea that big tent liberalism needs to dabble in some dehumanization to function is stupid.
Literally the bar is "treat everyone like a human" that means everyone
Literally the bar is "treat everyone like a human" that means everyone
a close up of a man 's face with a beard looking at the camera .
ALT: a close up of a man 's face with a beard looking at the camera .
media.tenor.com
December 7, 2025 at 1:40 AM
i'm so tired of this. The centrist idea that big tent liberalism needs to dabble in some dehumanization to function is stupid.
Literally the bar is "treat everyone like a human" that means everyone
Literally the bar is "treat everyone like a human" that means everyone
Reposted by Technology Phrases
Whatever happens, the lifetime grant of power over the rule of law to a handful of people requires reexamination. That power, for the health of the constitution — or its continued vitality, to be frank — requires dispersal.
Now seems like a good day to push my plan to fix Court: sortition — with all but the chief justice (whose role is set out in the Constitution) relegated to the appellate courts, and an expanded set of 12 seats filled by annual randomized selection from Senate-confirmed appellate judges.
The Supreme Court has six right-wing hacks who don't actually care about the Constitution, and even after Trump is gone, a revanchist court will remain a threat to liberal democracy.
December 5, 2025 at 12:59 AM
Whatever happens, the lifetime grant of power over the rule of law to a handful of people requires reexamination. That power, for the health of the constitution — or its continued vitality, to be frank — requires dispersal.
Reposted by Technology Phrases
The very structure of the court — vesting unchecked power for life in a few people, and hoping they'll wield that power in good faith — has led to this crisis. We can't depend on civic virtue as some bulwark against the corruption that now runs rampant.
Yep, the Supreme Court really is just a House of Lords—a purely political branch with bizarre veto power, wielded capriciously and without accountability. Time for massive reform.
December 5, 2025 at 12:55 AM
The very structure of the court — vesting unchecked power for life in a few people, and hoping they'll wield that power in good faith — has led to this crisis. We can't depend on civic virtue as some bulwark against the corruption that now runs rampant.
Reposted by Technology Phrases
Yes: as @taniel.bsky.social notes, Alito is flatly lying here — and telling Americans who recognize his dishonesty to kick rocks.
See, in direct refutation of Alito’s assertion, this passage from the district court opinion (source: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...)
See, in direct refutation of Alito’s assertion, this passage from the district court opinion (source: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...)
December 4, 2025 at 11:41 PM
Yes: as @taniel.bsky.social notes, Alito is flatly lying here — and telling Americans who recognize his dishonesty to kick rocks.
See, in direct refutation of Alito’s assertion, this passage from the district court opinion (source: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...)
See, in direct refutation of Alito’s assertion, this passage from the district court opinion (source: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...)
Reposted by Technology Phrases
As the district court noted, the Trump admin and Texas Republican lawmakers _said_ that they were acting on the basis of race. They said so openly and plainly. Are fact-finders in the lower courts seriously supposed to plug their ears and say “I can’t hear you”?
Texas clearly did a racial gerrymander, which is illegal.
A district court found that Texas did a racial gerrymander, rejecting the new map because it is illegal.
But the Supreme Court reversed it.
Because? Must assume the gerrymanderers were acting in good faith (despite the evidence otherwise).
A district court found that Texas did a racial gerrymander, rejecting the new map because it is illegal.
But the Supreme Court reversed it.
Because? Must assume the gerrymanderers were acting in good faith (despite the evidence otherwise).
December 4, 2025 at 11:24 PM
As the district court noted, the Trump admin and Texas Republican lawmakers _said_ that they were acting on the basis of race. They said so openly and plainly. Are fact-finders in the lower courts seriously supposed to plug their ears and say “I can’t hear you”?
*Fulnecky’s
December 2, 2025 at 11:29 PM
*Fulnecky’s
I also think we all agree that’s not the story’s point, I’m just talking about some small aspect. I’d go further and say I think Malloy knows/would acknowledge the essay didn’t quote the bible, but as Malloy wrote, that’s “the narrative”. Happy to refocus on Kulnecky’s awful goals if you want.
December 2, 2025 at 11:27 PM
I also think we all agree that’s not the story’s point, I’m just talking about some small aspect. I’d go further and say I think Malloy knows/would acknowledge the essay didn’t quote the bible, but as Malloy wrote, that’s “the narrative”. Happy to refocus on Kulnecky’s awful goals if you want.