@suemckenna.bsky.social
Reposted
NEW: 65 peers have written to all lords urging them not to block the bill.
“It is not our role to frustrate the clear democratic mandate” of the Commons.
Signed by the likes of Neil Kinnock, Ruth Davidson, Robert Winston and others.
“It is not our role to frustrate the clear democratic mandate” of the Commons.
Signed by the likes of Neil Kinnock, Ruth Davidson, Robert Winston and others.
November 13, 2025 at 3:04 PM
NEW: 65 peers have written to all lords urging them not to block the bill.
“It is not our role to frustrate the clear democratic mandate” of the Commons.
Signed by the likes of Neil Kinnock, Ruth Davidson, Robert Winston and others.
“It is not our role to frustrate the clear democratic mandate” of the Commons.
Signed by the likes of Neil Kinnock, Ruth Davidson, Robert Winston and others.
Reposted
Yeah, unless you are a white supremacist conspiracy theorists, there is no reason for anyone to be on X. Surprisingly Japanese people are still using it like nothing is happening. But Japanese people are not paying attention to politics so…
November 13, 2025 at 7:34 PM
Yeah, unless you are a white supremacist conspiracy theorists, there is no reason for anyone to be on X. Surprisingly Japanese people are still using it like nothing is happening. But Japanese people are not paying attention to politics so…
Reposted
To go on television and say "The girls the notorious sex trafficker abused weren't literally children, they were simply underage" is to repeat the self-justifying logic of the abuser. I'm sure Epstein and his enablers considered him morally superior to other paedophiles
November 13, 2025 at 5:50 PM
To go on television and say "The girls the notorious sex trafficker abused weren't literally children, they were simply underage" is to repeat the self-justifying logic of the abuser. I'm sure Epstein and his enablers considered him morally superior to other paedophiles
Reposted
I know this work in detail. And wish to deal with a couple of points. This WILL be misreported, and WILL contain misunderstandings about genetics.
Some of the work is valid and in my opinion adds interesting information to the evidence base around the life of Hitler.
Some of the work is valid and in my opinion adds interesting information to the evidence base around the life of Hitler.
November 13, 2025 at 6:40 AM
I know this work in detail. And wish to deal with a couple of points. This WILL be misreported, and WILL contain misunderstandings about genetics.
Some of the work is valid and in my opinion adds interesting information to the evidence base around the life of Hitler.
Some of the work is valid and in my opinion adds interesting information to the evidence base around the life of Hitler.