I’m sure there are some good things somewhere. But they’ve sure done a good job hiding them

C-2 needs to be scrapped in its entirety

Well, that’s just good parenting!

Your inner child?

The ramblings of the secretary of state for science and tech are cheaper than therapy I guess ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Hell, the statement is even more nonsensical than that. My rephrasing can be interpreted abstractly.

But no, he literally says:
“Verifying your age keeps a child safe.”

What child???

It’s wild how transparent they are being about that. “Verifying your age [instead of using a VPN] protects children.” Wtf, no it obviously doesn’t. It’s almost as if protecting children isn’t the goal

Only the legal owner of a domain can claim it as a handle on Bluesky luckily. But it’s still a good idea, so people know this is an official account

They put her in the AI machine to improve the machine, it's never the other way round

Despite the policy having such a ‘chilling effect’, Kathleen Stock still somehow managed to be so publicly transphobic as to cause widespread protests..?

IMO, pretending that such language doesn't exist, or that rules aren't there to facilitate communication, actually hurts more than it helps. It leads people to believe that style is only for the chosen few. In fact, style—like any language—can be learned.

I recently saw someone on here say that such fashion "rules" are pretentious. But when I looked at their photos, they were dressed in a very clear subcultural language that communicated their identity—young, hip, countercultural. They, too, were using language governed by "rules."

I wonder if preying on people with disabilities by not only failing to make accommodations for them but actively exploiting their differences for profit is a violation of the UK Equality Act 🤔 #FoodForThought