starcrow
@starcrow.bsky.social
Reposted by starcrow
Journalists' first obligation is not to the truth
Journalists' first obligation is not to justice
Journalists' first obligation is to selling copies
And to crib a line from Ronald Wilson Reagan, "if it takes a bloodbath [to sell those copies], so be it"
Journalists' first obligation is not to justice
Journalists' first obligation is to selling copies
And to crib a line from Ronald Wilson Reagan, "if it takes a bloodbath [to sell those copies], so be it"
April 4, 2025 at 5:55 AM
Journalists' first obligation is not to the truth
Journalists' first obligation is not to justice
Journalists' first obligation is to selling copies
And to crib a line from Ronald Wilson Reagan, "if it takes a bloodbath [to sell those copies], so be it"
Journalists' first obligation is not to justice
Journalists' first obligation is to selling copies
And to crib a line from Ronald Wilson Reagan, "if it takes a bloodbath [to sell those copies], so be it"
Reposted by starcrow
It was the same implicit threat they used time after time talking about the prosecution against Trump, and given Garland's slow-rolling, it sure seems to have worked
Our press are terrorists in the most literal possible sense of the word
Our press are terrorists in the most literal possible sense of the word
April 4, 2025 at 5:50 AM
It was the same implicit threat they used time after time talking about the prosecution against Trump, and given Garland's slow-rolling, it sure seems to have worked
Our press are terrorists in the most literal possible sense of the word
Our press are terrorists in the most literal possible sense of the word
Reposted by starcrow
Like, the Economist isn't even trying to say she's not guilty
The message is "yeah, she did it, and you should let her keep doing it, because if you don't we're going to help whip up a crowd of fascist revolutionaries to reject the election and behead Macron on the Champs-Elysees"
The message is "yeah, she did it, and you should let her keep doing it, because if you don't we're going to help whip up a crowd of fascist revolutionaries to reject the election and behead Macron on the Champs-Elysees"
April 4, 2025 at 5:49 AM
Like, the Economist isn't even trying to say she's not guilty
The message is "yeah, she did it, and you should let her keep doing it, because if you don't we're going to help whip up a crowd of fascist revolutionaries to reject the election and behead Macron on the Champs-Elysees"
The message is "yeah, she did it, and you should let her keep doing it, because if you don't we're going to help whip up a crowd of fascist revolutionaries to reject the election and behead Macron on the Champs-Elysees"