Sr133
banner
sr133.bsky.social
Sr133
@sr133.bsky.social
Forget it, Jake (he/him)
Reposted by Sr133
Who cares about people's lives when the right of retired teachers and public affairs managers to imagine they're just like Tonypandy miners is under threat
September 22, 2025 at 11:45 AM
Labour attempts to "set the agenda"
- Tories overspent and we need to do austerity
- We hate bats and snails
- We want politics to tread more lightly (but also we are Trump like disruptors)
- Immigrants are a squalid experiment
- Hitler is a gimmick and his plans for a thousand year reich won't work
September 22, 2025 at 10:59 AM
Aiui it's just the US business. How that interacts when you have a single platform, not sure.
September 22, 2025 at 10:51 AM
My impression from the occasional times a backroom person "spoke up" it was to huffily defend it against all slanders (see eg hendopolis, that Rob guy who used to do the Andrew Marr show)
September 22, 2025 at 8:44 AM
Yeah they don't care about them, just the naturalisers.
September 21, 2025 at 10:33 PM
Interesting revealed preference re those states in particular is "we don't want a rural hinterland". Very well, let's end the rural adjustments in the local government spending formula and see how those Reform county councils like it.
September 21, 2025 at 10:20 PM
Reposted by Sr133
If enacted in the terms suggested, this policy would leave children, disabled people, pensioners and anyone unfortunate enough to lose their job (including for being “foreign”, since Reform will also have torn up employment protections) destitute and on the streets
September 21, 2025 at 9:37 PM
September 21, 2025 at 10:00 PM
Assume the workaround in those cases would be to derecognise your entitlement to consular assistance, etc.
September 21, 2025 at 9:53 PM
I think the logical outcome of all this is a united Ireland to do away with all the constitutional novelties around the GFA.
September 21, 2025 at 9:18 PM
Rescinded and replaced with a renewable five years visa afaict. Might get challenged but if they withdraw from all the relevant statutes and treaties presumably they think they can do it.
September 21, 2025 at 9:14 PM
Well they ended up signing up for Hinkley Point C and giving it a very generous guaranteed revenue stream so... if you're going to do big hulking reactors arguably it was a better deal for the taxpayer than Sizewell C (with much more public £££ involved there)
September 21, 2025 at 8:34 PM
They did officially support nuclear power in the coalition era - just not with public subsidy (which they then fudged later)
September 21, 2025 at 8:25 PM