Spotts1701, Fighting The Good Fight
@spotts1701.bsky.social
I mean, the $2,000 could be inside you all along.
CUE THE "FULL HOUSE" MUSIC!
CUE THE "FULL HOUSE" MUSIC!
November 17, 2025 at 4:58 AM
I mean, the $2,000 could be inside you all along.
CUE THE "FULL HOUSE" MUSIC!
CUE THE "FULL HOUSE" MUSIC!
I remember reading articles pre-ACA about people being denied coverage because they were treated for acne as teenagers. Because it was now a “pre-existing condition”.
November 16, 2025 at 7:27 PM
I remember reading articles pre-ACA about people being denied coverage because they were treated for acne as teenagers. Because it was now a “pre-existing condition”.
But what if I really wanted the bread?
a close up of a dog 's face with a piece of bread in front of it .
ALT: a close up of a dog 's face with a piece of bread in front of it .
media.tenor.com
November 16, 2025 at 6:38 PM
But what if I really wanted the bread?
It makes them a sucker because they would have *zero* negotiating power.
November 16, 2025 at 4:27 PM
It makes them a sucker because they would have *zero* negotiating power.
He is *already* a lame duck President. Unless you're implying he's not going to leave office on January 20, 2029. Are you implying that, sir?
November 16, 2025 at 4:09 PM
He is *already* a lame duck President. Unless you're implying he's not going to leave office on January 20, 2029. Are you implying that, sir?
Despite 4 months ago saying there was no list and no one else they could charge. Because they don’t care if you catch them lying. It’s all for the service of Mad Lord Yam.
November 15, 2025 at 7:46 PM
Despite 4 months ago saying there was no list and no one else they could charge. Because they don’t care if you catch them lying. It’s all for the service of Mad Lord Yam.
Theoretically, there should be because parties can’t collude to settle a dispute if doing so would violate the principles of an adversarial system.
They get around that by making sure the case lands in front of “friendly” judges like Aileen Cannon or Reed O’Connor.
They get around that by making sure the case lands in front of “friendly” judges like Aileen Cannon or Reed O’Connor.
November 15, 2025 at 7:08 PM
Theoretically, there should be because parties can’t collude to settle a dispute if doing so would violate the principles of an adversarial system.
They get around that by making sure the case lands in front of “friendly” judges like Aileen Cannon or Reed O’Connor.
They get around that by making sure the case lands in front of “friendly” judges like Aileen Cannon or Reed O’Connor.
To be fair, Mad Lord Yam’s idea of “negotiation” is to hector the contractor into giving him a low price, then stiffing them on the bill.
November 15, 2025 at 5:23 PM
To be fair, Mad Lord Yam’s idea of “negotiation” is to hector the contractor into giving him a low price, then stiffing them on the bill.
Natalie is the woman who follows him around with the portable printer in a wagon to print out all the “good things” his sycophants post.
November 15, 2025 at 6:00 AM
Natalie is the woman who follows him around with the portable printer in a wagon to print out all the “good things” his sycophants post.
Take the fight to the enemy.
a picture of a panda with the words chaaaaaarge !!! written below it
ALT: a picture of a panda with the words chaaaaaarge !!! written below it
media.tenor.com
November 15, 2025 at 3:43 AM
Take the fight to the enemy.
“There's nothing we can do. I know for a fact there's no champagne on board.”
November 15, 2025 at 1:49 AM
“There's nothing we can do. I know for a fact there's no champagne on board.”
And given Mad Lord Yam’s erratic behavior, possibly also result in a quick exit from AF1 at 35,000 feet.
November 15, 2025 at 1:05 AM
And given Mad Lord Yam’s erratic behavior, possibly also result in a quick exit from AF1 at 35,000 feet.
But it does *not* protect her from future crimes. Like…oh, for example…perjury.
November 15, 2025 at 1:02 AM
But it does *not* protect her from future crimes. Like…oh, for example…perjury.
Negotiation would go like this…
“Here’s the price. Take it or leave it. Anyone else want to negotiate?”
“Here’s the price. Take it or leave it. Anyone else want to negotiate?”
November 15, 2025 at 12:25 AM
Negotiation would go like this…
“Here’s the price. Take it or leave it. Anyone else want to negotiate?”
“Here’s the price. Take it or leave it. Anyone else want to negotiate?”
Even if he wasn’t, Maxwell was appealing her conviction so the evidence had to be preserved on the long-shot chance she would get either a new trial or new sentencing hearing. That appeal ended last month.
November 15, 2025 at 12:15 AM
Even if he wasn’t, Maxwell was appealing her conviction so the evidence had to be preserved on the long-shot chance she would get either a new trial or new sentencing hearing. That appeal ended last month.
Then give up. But your sarcasm and doom posting is not helpful. So either shut up or go away.
November 14, 2025 at 11:33 PM
Then give up. But your sarcasm and doom posting is not helpful. So either shut up or go away.
He loves yelling at the press. Loves the attention. The fact that he *isn’t* doing that is very telling…
November 14, 2025 at 11:33 PM
He loves yelling at the press. Loves the attention. The fact that he *isn’t* doing that is very telling…
Do you have any other words or is your vocabulary tape jammed?
November 14, 2025 at 11:30 PM
Do you have any other words or is your vocabulary tape jammed?
A “pivot” towards “we cannot release due to an active criminal investigation”. That’s the pivot.
November 14, 2025 at 11:21 PM
A “pivot” towards “we cannot release due to an active criminal investigation”. That’s the pivot.
He cannot change the rule without a majority vote (and he doesn’t have the votes) and in this case if he refuse he can be sued and compelled to hold the vote.
November 14, 2025 at 11:18 PM
He cannot change the rule without a majority vote (and he doesn’t have the votes) and in this case if he refuse he can be sued and compelled to hold the vote.
He has no choice - he must, by rule hold the vote. And it is scheduled for Wednesday.
November 14, 2025 at 11:17 PM
He has no choice - he must, by rule hold the vote. And it is scheduled for Wednesday.