I accept that many on this website disagree with me.
I accept that many on this website disagree with me.
It’s not only a majority of Democratic voters that hate this approach. US allies see it too.
Chuck Schumer not finding a stronger word than “quixotic” for Trump’s plan to seize Greenland has been name checked to me more than once.
It’s not only a majority of Democratic voters that hate this approach. US allies see it too.
www.washingtonpost.com/national-sec...
www.washingtonpost.com/national-sec...
That's the Occam's razor explanation. Yet there's more focus on finding excuses for them. "No, you have to understand, honoring the Constitution is bad for their job prospects."
OK. So they're into it.
That's the Occam's razor explanation. Yet there's more focus on finding excuses for them. "No, you have to understand, honoring the Constitution is bad for their job prospects."
OK. So they're into it.
That's the Occam's razor explanation. Yet there's more focus on finding excuses for them. "No, you have to understand, honoring the Constitution is bad for their job prospects."
OK. So they're into it.
It's the only way for the "who cares about the fascism, I've made money" crowd to learn.
And here we fucking are.
And here we fucking are.
The Fed Chairman makes official statement that the President is using criminal charges to threaten him over monetary policy.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=KckG...
www.federalreserve.gov/newsevents/s...
This is one of the most bootlicking arguments I've read in a very long time. The whole premise of the argument is that scoring all of our allies for "ownership" of a land we already have bases on advances our power in some way.
This is one of the most bootlicking arguments I've read in a very long time. The whole premise of the argument is that scoring all of our allies for "ownership" of a land we already have bases on advances our power in some way.
That group primarily focuses on protecting European democracies from hostile Russian intelligence and military operations. Except the current US government hopes to see those hostile ops succeed.
That group primarily focuses on protecting European democracies from hostile Russian intelligence and military operations. Except the current US government hopes to see those hostile ops succeed.
Maybe supporting (or at least anti-anti-ing) politicians who cheered Russian imperialism, and trying to blame Russian aggression on people opposing Russian aggression, wasn’t a good way to oppose imperialism.
MILLER: Greenland should be part of the US. By what right does Denmark assert control over Greenland? The US is the power of NATO
T: So force is on the table?
M: Nobody is gonna fight the US militarily over future of Greenland