Sure! It’s absolutely true may of disingenuously used other definitions to confuse their situation and score rhetorical points. It doesn’t mean that’s right.

To get back to the man point, interpreting anti-Zionism as seeking the elimination of the state of Israel is a very reasonable interpretation.

Anti Zionist makes sense. The only concievable definition of Zionist I can think of is anti-anti-Zionist.

People can make mistakes with labels, it doesn’t make them right. Not the term useful/meaningful.

But it’s not. It’s a late 19th century and first half 20th century political movement.

But Zionist project is over, achieving its goal in the form of Israel. This is not hypothetical anymore. (Really, saying someone is a Zionist is achronistic.)

Therefore the logically meaning of anti Zionism is the destruction of the current state of Israel.

Isn’t antizionism tautologically asking for the destruction of Israel. If the aim of Zionism was the construction of Israel, antizionism’s aim would therefore be the end of that state.

I don’t think most Americans understand how foundational antisemitism is to Europe.

Religion is a concept invented by Christianity to enable conversion through the lie that you can change your “religion” not your culture. Christmas is a Christian holiday because it’s part of the Christian culture and not a different culture.

The genuine hot take is that there are hundreds of Holocaust movies but hardly any about centuries of non-Holocaust antisemitism not because "the Jews" want it, but rather because the heroes of the Holocaust movies tend to be non-Jews saving Jews, which is what audiences like to see.

I was talking to a non-Jew about Jewish stuff I do and she said, "wow, you must really believe in G-d"

My reaction was, "huh, I don't think that's ever come up"