Huge shoutout to @vangeliqueallen.bsky.social for co-leading this with me and others from @sciforgood.bsky.social !

Pilot sites are well on their way!

🖋️ You provide science + feedback
🎨 Students bring illustration, design, and storytelling

Deadline to sign up: Sept 5, 2025
For questions, reach out to chu2354@massart.edu

www.bit.ly/comicscollabfall2025

A chance to flex your #SciComm skills and support the next generation of science storytellers!

The science hasn’t changed. The threat is real. What’s changing is whether policymakers will stand with people, science, and health, or side with fossil fuel interests.

#ClimateAction #ProtectScience #PublicHealth

Despite overwhelming opposition, the EPA claims it is “unleashing American energy," leaning on an unvetted, antiscientific DOE report that dismisses the well-established harms of greenhouse gases.

It's not just experts—most American voters agree with the Endangerment finding, and are in overwhelming support of regulating greenhouse gas emissions.

Doctors pointed to rising respiratory illness, public health organizations stressed disproportionate burdens on disadvantaged groups, and state officials pledged to challenge the repeal in court.

Fewer than 10 spoke in favor of repeal. The rest issued a clear warning: reversing this protection will accelerate the climate crisis, worsen air pollution, and disproportionately harm already vulnerable communities.

On Day 1 of hearings, nearly 200 people testified — from physicians and public health leaders to clergy, farmers, and attorneys general.

That finding, rooted in a 2007 Supreme Court ruling, has been the legal backbone for regulating climate pollution from cars, power plants, and oil & gas for more than a decade.

Linked below! Never one to turn down a soapbox moment to share my passion for behavioral and social science researchers finding their place in the broader science landscape.