Tony Tagliatelle
@sammyspaghetti.bsky.social
Back once again for the very first time.
gEnUine AccOuNt
January 26, 2026 at 5:25 PM
gEnUine AccOuNt
Ha ha yeah very convincing.
January 26, 2026 at 5:25 PM
Ha ha yeah very convincing.
Nadia should defect to the Greens.
January 26, 2026 at 5:24 PM
Nadia should defect to the Greens.
It's really uncanny how Harman only ever gets dug up whenever there's something utterly indefensible to defend, it's an admission of total defeat.
January 26, 2026 at 5:23 PM
It's really uncanny how Harman only ever gets dug up whenever there's something utterly indefensible to defend, it's an admission of total defeat.
They should explain what they got wrong, point their followers to those who got it right, and then stfu forever.
January 26, 2026 at 4:12 PM
They should explain what they got wrong, point their followers to those who got it right, and then stfu forever.
Burnham was their only option. Everyone else is tainted with Starmerism.
January 26, 2026 at 4:07 PM
Burnham was their only option. Everyone else is tainted with Starmerism.
They could also usefully point their readers and followers towards more trustworthy sources.
January 26, 2026 at 4:06 PM
They could also usefully point their readers and followers towards more trustworthy sources.
Fuck that guy.
January 26, 2026 at 3:46 PM
Fuck that guy.
3.0. Labour is the official substitute Tory Party.
January 26, 2026 at 3:44 PM
3.0. Labour is the official substitute Tory Party.
And the Democrats will happily go along with the nearest available distraction.
January 26, 2026 at 3:43 PM
And the Democrats will happily go along with the nearest available distraction.
It won't be a coalition containing this Labour Party.
January 26, 2026 at 3:31 PM
It won't be a coalition containing this Labour Party.
"before it has real chance to effect the postive change."
It's made absolutely clear that it has no such intention whatsoever.
It's made absolutely clear that it has no such intention whatsoever.
January 26, 2026 at 1:54 PM
"before it has real chance to effect the postive change."
It's made absolutely clear that it has no such intention whatsoever.
It's made absolutely clear that it has no such intention whatsoever.
The Guardian and the BBC, with the active connivance of the Lajour right, made out for years that Jeremy Corbyn was a secret neonazi.
By contrast, they rolled out the red carpet for Starmer.
By contrast, they rolled out the red carpet for Starmer.
January 26, 2026 at 1:53 PM
The Guardian and the BBC, with the active connivance of the Lajour right, made out for years that Jeremy Corbyn was a secret neonazi.
By contrast, they rolled out the red carpet for Starmer.
By contrast, they rolled out the red carpet for Starmer.
Grow up, Steve.
January 26, 2026 at 1:12 PM
Grow up, Steve.
Fitting that the Tories have Farage's personnel and both parties have his policies, given that Farage decided the results of the last two GEs. You might think that there'd be concern about a neonazi controlling UK politics, but antisemitism isn't *actually* treated with much concern in the UK.
January 26, 2026 at 1:11 PM
Fitting that the Tories have Farage's personnel and both parties have his policies, given that Farage decided the results of the last two GEs. You might think that there'd be concern about a neonazi controlling UK politics, but antisemitism isn't *actually* treated with much concern in the UK.
Are you some sort of prick?
January 26, 2026 at 1:03 PM
Are you some sort of prick?
That guy must have been in a coma between 2015 and 2019. He thinks *Starmer* gets rough treatment in the press? Are the Guardian, BBC, Independent etc calling him a secret neonazi?
January 26, 2026 at 11:44 AM
That guy must have been in a coma between 2015 and 2019. He thinks *Starmer* gets rough treatment in the press? Are the Guardian, BBC, Independent etc calling him a secret neonazi?
There's crossed wires here, my post was about Burnham.
January 26, 2026 at 11:21 AM
There's crossed wires here, my post was about Burnham.
"Look, he's not interested in your paltry, insignificant culture."
January 26, 2026 at 10:48 AM
"Look, he's not interested in your paltry, insignificant culture."
He'd need to prove that he's no longer attached to the Labour project first though.
January 26, 2026 at 10:45 AM
He'd need to prove that he's no longer attached to the Labour project first though.