SagelyWarrior
banner
sagelywarrior5.bsky.social
SagelyWarrior
@sagelywarrior5.bsky.social
I'm a spicy social justice Warrior, 💪was battle-fatigued but- WE MUST #RESIST!
Still needing ⬆️ sanity & 🚫toxicity.
🚫 fascism
🌊🇺🇲🇸🇮🌈
#Pets #Turtles #Cats
#BlueResistance
#Angret
#DemocracyNotOligarchy
Reposted by SagelyWarrior
We're talking about the Epstein Files Transparency Act, its speedy passage in the House and Senate, what happens next, and what it can and can't do in terms of redactions and withholdings, the pocket veto, and way more.

Join us live at 11 am ET or on the replay.

youtube.com/live/xEB1mOJ...
SHOCKER! Epstein Bill Passes Almost UNANIMOUSLY-- BUT WHAT'S NEXT?!
YouTube video by Elizabeth Cronise McLaughlin
youtube.com
November 19, 2025 at 3:31 PM
Well....its "democracy challenged" here, for sure but we still get some wins too. And, I follow events in UA every nite, often multiple times thruout the day. Slava Ukraini!!
November 19, 2025 at 4:23 AM
Thank you sooo much for all your posts & hard work here, ECM. Your help & clarity is needed & I bet you're tired too, of repeating things. Hopefully you can get a cup of tea <or stronger??!> & relax soon. Catch you tomorrow a.m.
November 19, 2025 at 4:20 AM
Reposted by SagelyWarrior
IF YOU READ NO OTHER PORTION OF THE EPSTEIN FILES TRANSPARENCY ACT, read this one.

EVERY SINGLE DOCUMENT THEY WITHHOLD has to be indexed, published in the Federal Register, and submitted to Congress with an explanation.

And scroll down to understand why THEY ARE NOT PERMITTED TO WITHHOLD IT ALL.
November 18, 2025 at 11:36 PM
Reposted by SagelyWarrior
Here is what the DOJ has to do if they redact anything. Note the reporting requirements for redactions, which is a backstop on the “narrowly tailored and temporary” requirement above, and the required naming of public officials and dignitaries.
November 18, 2025 at 11:25 PM
Reposted by SagelyWarrior
Here is what is permitted to be redacted. Note the red underlined portions.
November 18, 2025 at 11:15 PM
I'll take the win today-I cried when I saw the vote...I was in the car & NOT driving, thankfully cuz I really teared up. I was sort of surprised by that, but it WAS moving, nonetheless to me.
November 19, 2025 at 4:00 AM
Omg, me too. And, I thought I would never, ever be one to say this but I am THRILLED to not have a partner nor esp now @ my age, would I be "considered" in that way. So glad. It's quite freeing, tbh.
November 18, 2025 at 6:59 PM
Well, the system has been corrupted for decades since the Powell memo & we’ve been conditioned for nearly this long to realize that “engagement” was a lost cause if corporations, lobbyists & lawmakers are constantly working AGAINST the People! Throw in gerrymandering, greed, & corruption too.
November 18, 2025 at 4:28 AM
Yup, not only would Epstein know about these, may have even participated too. It’s one thing to do this, but what if he & Epstein engaged in “other proclivities”, w/ each other? That would be an even FARTHER bridge for MAGA than involvement w/ boys, me thinks.
November 18, 2025 at 2:52 AM
Hmmm….makes a lot of sense to me.

bsky.app/profile/ther...
Trump isn’t afraid of the Epstein files because of girls. He’s afraid because of manhood.👇
www.jackhopkinsnow.com
November 18, 2025 at 2:45 AM