Rosemary J Thompson
LightNews LightNews
banner
rosemaryjthompson.bsky.social
Rosemary J Thompson
@rosemaryjthompson.bsky.social
17 followers 89 following 1 posts
God comes first in my life, and I strive to walk in love, patience, and gratitude. I value integrity, kindness, and emotional maturity 🌹
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted by Rosemary J Thompson
chrisgeidner.bsky.social
A reminder that, in the midst of everything else, the Trump administration is an incredible combination of entitlement and sloppiness.

DOJ: "We were too busy invading Venezuela to address your court order, Chief Judge Boasberg."

Boasberg: "You didn't even follow the rules in filing this request."
Case 1:25-cv-00766-JEB Document 223 Filed 01/04/26 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LIYANARA SANCHEZ, as next friend on behalf of FRENGEL REYES MOTA, et al., Petitioners-Plaintiffs, J.G.G., et al., Plaintiffs, Case No: 1:25-cv-00766-JEB V. DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, et al., Respondents-Defendants. DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION Given substantial changes on the ground in Venezuela and the fluid nature of the unfolding situation, Defendants respectfully move for an extension to respond to this Court's Order (ECF 214) directing them to propose a remedy by Monday, January 5. Over the weekend, the United States apprehended Nicolas Maduro. As a result, the situation on the ground in Venezuela has changed dramatically. Defendants thus need additional time to determine the feasibility of various proposals. Defendants therefore request a 7-day extension to evaluate and determine what remedies are possible. Dated: January 4, 2025 Respectfully submitted, Brett A. Shumate Assistant Attorney General Civil Division Drew C. Ensign Deputy Assistant Attorney General Case 1:25-cv-00766-JEB • Document 223 Filed 01/04/26 Page 2 of 2 Office of Immigration Litigation /s/ Tiberius Davis Tiberius Davis Counsel to the Assistant Attorney General Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice Anthony Nicastro Acting Director Office of Immigration Litigation Counsel for Respondents-Defendants MINUTE ORDER: As the Government's 223 Motion fails to comply with LCvR 7(m), the Court ORDERS that it shall file a Rule 7(m) Notice by 5:00 p.m. today. So ORDERED by Chief Judge James E. Boasberg on January 5, 2026. (Icjeb4) Order (m) DUTY TO CONFER ON NONDISPOSITIVE MOTIONS. Before filing any nondispositive motion in a civil action, counsel shall discuss the anticipated motion with opposing counsel in a good-faith effort to determine whether there is any opposition to the relief sought and, if there is, to narrow the areas of disagreement. The duty to confer also applies to non-incarcerated parties appearing pro se. A party shall include in its motion a statement that the required discussion occurred, and a statement as to whether the motion is opposed.
January 5, 2026 at 8:02 PM
Reposted by Rosemary J Thompson
roryjohnston.bsky.social
on to the next one
December 27, 2025 at 4:15 PM
rosemaryjthompson.bsky.social
All in one ❤️
December 27, 2025 at 4:44 PM