...if at all. Iraq hasn't been rebuilt. It changes a country permanently and puts it back decades if not centuries

Arguably because AI also has hallucinations which naturally make them unsafe. They will get collisions caused by it with non-zero probability.

Secondly that's actually a maths problem that can be done fully deterministically. Why need an AI for that? Especially one based on LLMS?

Being honest, for anything that is resource optimal or adjacent, the UK is broadly the wrong market. It's a combination of hostile market dynamics and lack of community care of resources. It makes sharing economy generally worse, especially in polarised society with broken social contract.

Sure. Though that's like asking "are people for or against gravity". Gravity exists and takes primacy over us & our opinions. It doesn't really matter what we do, gravity will always be an ever present factor. Yet many countries today have stepped into post truth & think they can vote gravity away.

Right, but there are plans grounded in reality. They work.

There are plans that aren't grounded in reality. They never work.

They won't accept taxes in any form.

You get it! Yes exactly!

Rarely. What usually happens is domestic demand slows.

Domestic manufacturing doesn't see corresponding increases as the original demand is predicated on lower foreign production prices. Such models cease to be viable, leading to job losses. Meaning less disposable income & lower spending.

This applies to us too. We are small, and like you depend on product sales, but also carry the loss making segment of the recycling stage of circular operations until the sale of products. If the sales never come, it's crippling.

Sadly, that means that non-science CAH degrees underperform for living parity in the UK.

*Super important to say this doesn't mean ars grads can't achieve or switch. Many have. I myself can think of two current & former colleagues with doctorates in science who started with English degrees

It is unsound to compare them to each other. It should be compared against total, general degree performance. Which is the following from that report.

The analytical degrees match the general degree distribution for full-time work. Despite the non-science CAH being 59% of the graduate pool.

Sadly, this means the IMPORTANT stats are the ones for full-time employment.

But...

That's a little bit naughty @hetanshah.bsky.social 😁

The UK cost of living necessitates working full-time. It is not possible to rent a property as a single earner, on a single part-time wage, without significant support.

Everything else is under-employment.

Which strategy?

Corbyn's generally "unstable equilibrium". Modelling them always hits chaos fast. Greens copying will be the same.

Lay chair with subordinate MPs, works for stable equilibrium (even if they also make wrong decisions). That's Labour's NEC relationship to party leader.

If the membership rightly choose a lay chair, who can't be a politician and the politicians remain under the control of the lay chair, that can work.
However, the politician must be subordinate. This is disparate from a UK political party and most politicians aren't able to work like that anyway.

It gets worse Dan. While we need operational, logical, intelligent people, this is also an oxymoron. As a political party can't be a party is a politician doesn't exist somewhere & lead it.

The biggest lesson though was to keep the scheme 100% decentralised & community owned. Councils & Gov cannot run it. If they touch it, it falls apart rapidly.

It does. The boss was involved in designing a DRT vehicle sharing scheme in 2020. It worked using per-mile insurance & billing. It kept cars cycling, but allowed trading of the credits into bus & E-bike. Implicit integrated transport system.

Not a chance they can