Signal: @moroserabbit.34
Briefly, I’m the pro se plaintiff-appellant in a 9th Circuit appeal challenging the doctrines of § 1983 qualified & absolute immunity.
(1/7)
basically, when someone you love dies, it isn’t just them that you miss, but the parts of yourself that person brought out of you that can never be brought out again.
i feel that with my dad.
basically, when someone you love dies, it isn’t just them that you miss, but the parts of yourself that person brought out of you that can never be brought out again.
i feel that with my dad.
Cats will be caged to protect innocent fairies everywhere 🧚♀️🫶🍄
Turns out it was just a global order on the .gov shutdown that has nothing to do with my case. Talk about anti-climactic…
Turns out it was just a global order on the .gov shutdown that has nothing to do with my case. Talk about anti-climactic…
Respectfully, you are Enough. You always have been enough, you will forever be enough. There will never come a time when your enoughness is not sufficient.
You are forever, and for all time enough.
So are you.
Respectfully, you are Enough. You always have been enough, you will forever be enough. There will never come a time when your enoughness is not sufficient.
You are forever, and for all time enough.
So are you.
Making up totally new and blatantly unconstitutional legal doctrines is not justification for anything but a psych evaluation.
Making up totally new and blatantly unconstitutional legal doctrines is not justification for anything but a psych evaluation.
It’s just puzzling to me that the legal world hasn’t yet discovered that a scientific approach to problem solving might be better than just facts—> issues —> controlling precedent.
Frankly, legal analysis is a joke compared to o chem.
It’s just puzzling to me that the legal world hasn’t yet discovered that a scientific approach to problem solving might be better than just facts—> issues —> controlling precedent.
Frankly, legal analysis is a joke compared to o chem.
Frankly, legal analysis is a joke compared to o chem.
Are we 12?
Are we 12?
Sorry to my trial peeps. It just doesn’t hit that dopamine for me anymore—not even in federal court.
I’m a junkie.
Sorry to my trial peeps. It just doesn’t hit that dopamine for me anymore—not even in federal court.
I’m a junkie.
Sorry if you’re a fan. No, really.
Sorry if you’re a fan. No, really.
I use AI extensively for deep textual analysis of very large precedent data sets in algorithmic game theory applications.
DeepSeek destroys GPT and has a *very* low error rate when employing the data I provide.
I use AI extensively for deep textual analysis of very large precedent data sets in algorithmic game theory applications.
DeepSeek destroys GPT and has a *very* low error rate when employing the data I provide.
I use AI extensively for deep textual analysis of very large precedent data sets in algorithmic game theory applications.
DeepSeek destroys GPT and has a *very* low error rate when employing the data I provide.
@sunsphx.bsky.social/@HoustonRockets tickets on Nov. 24 that we can't use (change in travel plans). KD's 1st game back in Phx, etc.
At cost, $180 for the pair. Sxn 218, Row 1.
Book 'er, Danno!
@sunsphx.bsky.social/@HoustonRockets tickets on Nov. 24 that we can't use (change in travel plans). KD's 1st game back in Phx, etc.
At cost, $180 for the pair. Sxn 218, Row 1.
Book 'er, Danno!
He walked at 9 months, almost as if he knew he wouldn’t have much time. His favorite thing to do was throw rocks into water. He loved the moon. He called butterflies “buddy buddies.” I miss him every day.
He walked at 9 months, almost as if he knew he wouldn’t have much time. His favorite thing to do was throw rocks into water. He loved the moon. He called butterflies “buddy buddies.” I miss him every day.