Ricardo Reis
r2rsquared.bsky.social
Ricardo Reis
@r2rsquared.bsky.social
AW Phillips Professor of Economics at the LSE
*** The next step for Trump's economic policy ***

President Tump loves tariffs.
Tariffs are taxes on the consumption of imported goods.
What about boldly following through and... extending his favorite policy tool to all goods?

Hear me out…
April 13, 2025 at 11:24 AM
Reposted by Ricardo Reis
Required reading from @r2rsquared.bsky.social on what lies behind r* personal.lse.ac.uk/reisr/papers... "This paper first documents the differing trends of these four R-stars in the quarter-century before the pandemic. Then, it proposes a general framework to make sense of their joint evolution"
personal.lse.ac.uk
March 29, 2025 at 5:00 PM
The direct, fast, and large impact of the tariff hike is to raise US inflation. The hike may also cause a recession. There is too much focus on the latter and neglect of the former.
April 11, 2025 at 9:16 AM
This "partisan bias" in the data mattered during Covid in 2021-22:
"...had all expectations become as unanchored as those of Republicans, average inflation would have been two to four percentage points higher for much of the pandemic period"

www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
January 25, 2025 at 10:52 AM
There is *a lot* of useful information in the disagreement that we see in the expectations data. Which of it is useful depends on the question you are asking.
Recent references for those interested:
-- bfi.uchicago.edu/wp-content/u...
-- personal.lse.ac.uk/reisr/papers...
January 25, 2025 at 10:50 AM
Measuring inflation expectations would be futile" *if* there was FIRE. Because people do not have RE, these measurements are potentially very valuable, and it turns out indeed they are very useful data for modeling and forecasting inflation.
Under full information rational expectations (FIRE), these data would be "solely a mirror of the outcomes that we could measure in the aggregate data. Measuring expectations was as futile as measuring utility." A picture like this suggests a rejection of FIRE.
Making an effort to migrate into there from X, this figure sent by Torsten Slok made the rounds yesterday:
January 25, 2025 at 10:49 AM
Under full information rational expectations (FIRE), these data would be "solely a mirror of the outcomes that we could measure in the aggregate data. Measuring expectations was as futile as measuring utility." A picture like this suggests a rejection of FIRE.
Making an effort to migrate into there from X, this figure sent by Torsten Slok made the rounds yesterday:
January 25, 2025 at 10:47 AM
Making an effort to migrate into there from X, this figure sent by Torsten Slok made the rounds yesterday:
January 25, 2025 at 10:45 AM
I see you have €1 saved earning interest.
That's right.
Please give it to me and I'll pay you the same interest.
Ok.
Actually, paying you interest is subsidising you, forget about it.
Uh?
I'm the govt, I could require you to give it to me.
🤔

cepr.org/voxeu/column...
Monetary policies that do not subsidise banks
Central banks pay interest on commercial banks’ holdings of cash reserves at the central bank. Thus, recent rate increases imply larger interest payments to commercial banks and loss of revenue for na...
cepr.org
February 21, 2024 at 11:27 AM