Francisco I. Pedraza
@quicopedraza.bsky.social
PolSciProf, ASU SPGS, https://clapr.asu.edu, REP, Latino, immigration, Am politics, survey methods, 1stGen past 8th grade, public schools product, www.priec.org stan, Roots: Idaho-Michoacán then IA-WA-TX-MI-CA-AZ 🇺🇸🇲🇽
So, we see Charlie Brown as the Dems.
But, when we keep in mind that the Senate is one of the most anti-Democratic features of our system of government, James Madison might say Charlie Brown is also you. As in me. As in us. As in the people.
But, when we keep in mind that the Senate is one of the most anti-Democratic features of our system of government, James Madison might say Charlie Brown is also you. As in me. As in us. As in the people.
November 10, 2025 at 1:20 AM
So, we see Charlie Brown as the Dems.
But, when we keep in mind that the Senate is one of the most anti-Democratic features of our system of government, James Madison might say Charlie Brown is also you. As in me. As in us. As in the people.
But, when we keep in mind that the Senate is one of the most anti-Democratic features of our system of government, James Madison might say Charlie Brown is also you. As in me. As in us. As in the people.
Please, Senator Kelly, hold the line.
Dems hold the higher moral ground and stronger bargaining position on this shutdown.
Too much is at stake to concede now. Giving in risks losing the leverage you do have, and risks undoing hard won gains to health care coverage over the past decade.
Dems hold the higher moral ground and stronger bargaining position on this shutdown.
Too much is at stake to concede now. Giving in risks losing the leverage you do have, and risks undoing hard won gains to health care coverage over the past decade.
November 9, 2025 at 11:07 PM
Please, Senator Kelly, hold the line.
Dems hold the higher moral ground and stronger bargaining position on this shutdown.
Too much is at stake to concede now. Giving in risks losing the leverage you do have, and risks undoing hard won gains to health care coverage over the past decade.
Dems hold the higher moral ground and stronger bargaining position on this shutdown.
Too much is at stake to concede now. Giving in risks losing the leverage you do have, and risks undoing hard won gains to health care coverage over the past decade.
For sure. But don’t stop there. May even be a viable starting point for addressing party polarization in general.
November 7, 2025 at 5:55 PM
For sure. But don’t stop there. May even be a viable starting point for addressing party polarization in general.
Finishing this project in 2018, we reflected on how SecComm would undermine ACA enrollment during Trump 1.0, discussed implications of findings for trust in gov as info/resource provider for pandemic crises.
The threat of masked men grabbing you out of nowhere must make this concern more acute.
The threat of masked men grabbing you out of nowhere must make this concern more acute.
November 5, 2025 at 8:44 PM
Finishing this project in 2018, we reflected on how SecComm would undermine ACA enrollment during Trump 1.0, discussed implications of findings for trust in gov as info/resource provider for pandemic crises.
The threat of masked men grabbing you out of nowhere must make this concern more acute.
The threat of masked men grabbing you out of nowhere must make this concern more acute.
Reposted by Francisco I. Pedraza
Whoever took these candid photos deserves a raise. Thank you, @priec.bsky.social, for capturing so much of our 20th anniversary celebration conference. Excited for all of the other PRIECs this anniversary year!!!
October 5, 2025 at 5:20 PM
Whoever took these candid photos deserves a raise. Thank you, @priec.bsky.social, for capturing so much of our 20th anniversary celebration conference. Excited for all of the other PRIECs this anniversary year!!!