😅

The Manuscript Adviser is more specific and currently provides feedback on tittle, abstract, missing references and overstated claims. The latter being the most interesting aspect so far. Similar to the gaps idea in www.qedscience.com but qed was much stronger on the one example I tested both on

With the Reading Assistant I tried to get it to act as reviewer and got a response that makes it look like they are trying their best to avoid this use case.

🧪🧠 Experimental results 🥁🥁: we submitted the same #neuroscience paper twice to @qedscience.bsky.social loved the concept, organization and text & experiment suggestions. Both reviews incisive, not identical (what does this teach us about LLMs?). Strong A+ @natureportfolio.nature.com @science.org

Seems like the outage is over and you can now access the qed platform again 🧐😅

Hi Wouter,

Please email us at info@qedscience.com with the emails you used, and we’ll solve it right away!

Thanks Eugene, we surely aim to!

Thank you Ryan!

Share the final verdict too! 👩‍⚖️