@qedscience.bsky.social
Reposted
Für life sciences gibt es den Tool von @qedscience.bsky.social . Es funktioniert eigentlich super: man erhält ein strukturiertes und sehr relevantes Feedback. Ich verstehe also die ganze Aufregung nicht: KI-Tools werden immer besser und als Hilfsmittel für die Begutachtung bereits sehr hilfreich.
January 13, 2026 at 12:21 PM
Für life sciences gibt es den Tool von @qedscience.bsky.social . Es funktioniert eigentlich super: man erhält ein strukturiertes und sehr relevantes Feedback. Ich verstehe also die ganze Aufregung nicht: KI-Tools werden immer besser und als Hilfsmittel für die Begutachtung bereits sehr hilfreich.
Science doesn’t actually run on truth – it runs on validity.
In our latest blog post we explore why science advances not by proving absolute truths, but by continuously evaluating how valid a claim is within a given paradigm.
qedscience.com/blog/why-we-...
@odedrechavi.bsky.social
In our latest blog post we explore why science advances not by proving absolute truths, but by continuously evaluating how valid a claim is within a given paradigm.
qedscience.com/blog/why-we-...
@odedrechavi.bsky.social
Why We Seek Validation
The scientific method, humanity’s most successful approach to uncovering how the world works, doesn’t rely on “truth” as much as it relies on validity. In fact, “valid” often serves as a sharper, more...
qedscience.com
January 8, 2026 at 1:22 PM
Science doesn’t actually run on truth – it runs on validity.
In our latest blog post we explore why science advances not by proving absolute truths, but by continuously evaluating how valid a claim is within a given paradigm.
qedscience.com/blog/why-we-...
@odedrechavi.bsky.social
In our latest blog post we explore why science advances not by proving absolute truths, but by continuously evaluating how valid a claim is within a given paradigm.
qedscience.com/blog/why-we-...
@odedrechavi.bsky.social
Reposted
2025 was a rough year for science worldwide (and in general), but, despite everything, I am optimistic. Why? Because of
@qedscience.bsky.social! This crazy endeavour actually has a chance of changing how academia works.. 👇
@qedscience.bsky.social! This crazy endeavour actually has a chance of changing how academia works.. 👇
a man pointing to a sign that says believe
ALT: a man pointing to a sign that says believe
media.tenor.com
December 31, 2025 at 1:00 PM
2025 was a rough year for science worldwide (and in general), but, despite everything, I am optimistic. Why? Because of
@qedscience.bsky.social! This crazy endeavour actually has a chance of changing how academia works.. 👇
@qedscience.bsky.social! This crazy endeavour actually has a chance of changing how academia works.. 👇
Reposted
And here's the report @qedscience.bsky.social generated for our new paper, summarizing what's new and what was already known before. I'm planning to submit q.e.d's reports as cover letters together with my pre-prints from now on (and so should you!)
December 18, 2025 at 11:30 AM
And here's the report @qedscience.bsky.social generated for our new paper, summarizing what's new and what was already known before. I'm planning to submit q.e.d's reports as cover letters together with my pre-prints from now on (and so should you!)
Reposted
Our🥶COOLNESS paper to date is finally published! Ice cold and lithium dramatically delay forgetting (extend memory) in C. elegans. Why? read all about it! 👇
rdcu.be/eVhn2
rdcu.be/eVhn2
Cold and lithium delay forgetting of olfactory memories in Caenorhabditis elegans
Nature Neuroscience - In this study, we identify an actively regulated process that governs the rate of forgetting in Caenorhabditis elegans, modulated by both temperature and the mood-stabilizing...
rdcu.be
December 18, 2025 at 11:29 AM
Our🥶COOLNESS paper to date is finally published! Ice cold and lithium dramatically delay forgetting (extend memory) in C. elegans. Why? read all about it! 👇
rdcu.be/eVhn2
rdcu.be/eVhn2
Reposted
An article about @qedscience.bsky.social this time in @lemonde.fr 🍷 Would you prefer to get feedback on your paper in French? Lots of scientists in France are q.e.ding❤️https://www.lemonde.fr/sciences/article/2025/12/10/l-evaluation-des-articles-scientifiques-bouleversee-par-l-ia_6656706_1650684.html
December 12, 2025 at 5:18 PM
An article about @qedscience.bsky.social this time in @lemonde.fr 🍷 Would you prefer to get feedback on your paper in French? Lots of scientists in France are q.e.ding❤️https://www.lemonde.fr/sciences/article/2025/12/10/l-evaluation-des-articles-scientifiques-bouleversee-par-l-ia_6656706_1650684.html
Thank you @lemonde.fr! If you’re a French scientist, you should try qed. Also if you’re not.
www.lemonde.fr/sciences/art...
www.lemonde.fr/sciences/art...
L’IA bouleverse l’évaluation des articles scientifiques
Des éditeurs de revues scientifiques testent des plateformes d’intelligence artificielle pour analyser leurs avantages et inconvénients lors de l’examen d’un article soumis à un journal.
www.lemonde.fr
December 12, 2025 at 5:35 PM
Thank you @lemonde.fr! If you’re a French scientist, you should try qed. Also if you’re not.
www.lemonde.fr/sciences/art...
www.lemonde.fr/sciences/art...
“qed analyzes manuscripts with remarkable precision, depth and logic”. A great write-up on @qedscience.bsky.social
by Jörg Klug in @laborjournal.bsky.social.
Enthusiastic user feedback + thoughtful critique = the conversation science needs around AI and review.
laborjournal.de/rubric/hinte...
by Jörg Klug in @laborjournal.bsky.social.
Enthusiastic user feedback + thoughtful critique = the conversation science needs around AI and review.
laborjournal.de/rubric/hinte...
Hintergrund - Macht KI-Tool q.e.d Science Forschungsartikel besser als Peer Review
Das KI-Tool q.e.d Science analysiert und verbesser wissenschaftliche Manuskripte. Die ersten Nutzer-Rückmeldungen sind positiv. Doch ob das Tool den klassischen Peer Review in naher Zukunft überflüss...
laborjournal.de
December 9, 2025 at 10:14 AM
“qed analyzes manuscripts with remarkable precision, depth and logic”. A great write-up on @qedscience.bsky.social
by Jörg Klug in @laborjournal.bsky.social.
Enthusiastic user feedback + thoughtful critique = the conversation science needs around AI and review.
laborjournal.de/rubric/hinte...
by Jörg Klug in @laborjournal.bsky.social.
Enthusiastic user feedback + thoughtful critique = the conversation science needs around AI and review.
laborjournal.de/rubric/hinte...
Reposted
I liked this thoughtful article about q.e.d‘s AI Review and our collaboration with @openrxiv.bsky.social (biorxiv) in @nature.com. Yes, AI is here to stay and we need to get ready. One important note that was missing in this piece: we intentionally made qed an authors-centric tool (see more below) 👇
@nature.com asked me to write an op-ed on the perspective of the AI reviewing process, prompted by the recent partnership between @biorxivpreprint.bsky.social and @qedscience.bsky.social
Hope my perspective adds value to the conversation.
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
Hope my perspective adds value to the conversation.
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
AI reviewers are here — we are not ready
Artificial intelligence promises rapid and polite feedback on papers — but we must first review the reviewer.
www.nature.com
December 3, 2025 at 2:29 PM
I liked this thoughtful article about q.e.d‘s AI Review and our collaboration with @openrxiv.bsky.social (biorxiv) in @nature.com. Yes, AI is here to stay and we need to get ready. One important note that was missing in this piece: we intentionally made qed an authors-centric tool (see more below) 👇
Interesting fact: even though our core focus is currently biological research papers, ~15% of total uploads are of clinical papers, and many upload grants… even though we haven’t officially dealt with those (yet 😉).
Which areas do you think we should go into next?
Which areas do you think we should go into next?
December 2, 2025 at 3:34 PM
Interesting fact: even though our core focus is currently biological research papers, ~15% of total uploads are of clinical papers, and many upload grants… even though we haven’t officially dealt with those (yet 😉).
Which areas do you think we should go into next?
Which areas do you think we should go into next?
Reposted
Recently tried it on our published paper (neuroscience, biological psychiatry field, so out of the main @qedscience.bsky.social domain). But still, very impressed with the identified gaps and identified novelty in the field! Can we re-use/paraphrase some of the novelty findings? Highly recommend!
November 25, 2025 at 4:13 PM
Recently tried it on our published paper (neuroscience, biological psychiatry field, so out of the main @qedscience.bsky.social domain). But still, very impressed with the identified gaps and identified novelty in the field! Can we re-use/paraphrase some of the novelty findings? Highly recommend!
Let us know!
Do you do journal clubs in your lab? if you run the paper you're presenting in @qedscience.bsky.social (it's great for finding -problems) please let me know! I'd love to echo the discussion here, and compare your insights about the paper with q.e.d's comments #qedjournalclub
November 25, 2025 at 3:48 PM
Let us know!
Reposted
Why it's encouraged to run your paper in @qedscience.bsky.social as soon as possible
November 25, 2025 at 3:22 PM
Why it's encouraged to run your paper in @qedscience.bsky.social as soon as possible
Check it out!
A really nice article in The Scientist about q.e.d!
@qedscience.bsky.social - If you're not using it yet, now's the time!
www.the-scientist.com/q-e-d-an-ai-...
@qedscience.bsky.social - If you're not using it yet, now's the time!
www.the-scientist.com/q-e-d-an-ai-...
q.e.d: An AI Tool for Smarter Manuscript Review
A team of researchers developed q.e.d, an AI-powered system designed to deliver rigorous and constructive feedback on scientific manuscripts in minutes.
www.the-scientist.com
November 19, 2025 at 3:17 PM
Check it out!
Reposted
ai peer review: "The problem is that the fun ends when you need to publish it and go through the [review] process.”
@OdedRechavi
@qedscience.bsky.social
www.the-scientist.com/q-e-d-an-ai-...
@OdedRechavi
@qedscience.bsky.social
www.the-scientist.com/q-e-d-an-ai-...
q.e.d: An AI Tool for Smarter Manuscript Review
A team of researchers developed q.e.d, an AI-powered system designed to deliver rigorous and constructive feedback on scientific manuscripts in minutes.
www.the-scientist.com
November 19, 2025 at 1:00 PM
ai peer review: "The problem is that the fun ends when you need to publish it and go through the [review] process.”
@OdedRechavi
@qedscience.bsky.social
www.the-scientist.com/q-e-d-an-ai-...
@OdedRechavi
@qedscience.bsky.social
www.the-scientist.com/q-e-d-an-ai-...
Reposted
Most setbacks (logic gaps, novelty confusion, unsupported conclusions) are preventable.
That’s what the @lifescienceeditors.bsky.social x @qedscience.bsky.social pilot is for.
Impact, not (necessarily 😉) impact factor.
Please reach out! We'd love to help!
www.lifescienceeditors.com/qed-pilot/
That’s what the @lifescienceeditors.bsky.social x @qedscience.bsky.social pilot is for.
Impact, not (necessarily 😉) impact factor.
Please reach out! We'd love to help!
www.lifescienceeditors.com/qed-pilot/
Limited Time AI offering! - Scientific editing and writing experts - Life Science Editors
AI that thinks critically. Editors who know what matters.
www.lifescienceeditors.com
November 14, 2025 at 8:27 PM
Most setbacks (logic gaps, novelty confusion, unsupported conclusions) are preventable.
That’s what the @lifescienceeditors.bsky.social x @qedscience.bsky.social pilot is for.
Impact, not (necessarily 😉) impact factor.
Please reach out! We'd love to help!
www.lifescienceeditors.com/qed-pilot/
That’s what the @lifescienceeditors.bsky.social x @qedscience.bsky.social pilot is for.
Impact, not (necessarily 😉) impact factor.
Please reach out! We'd love to help!
www.lifescienceeditors.com/qed-pilot/
Reposted
Tried @qedscience.bsky.social by running our published paper through it. It identified 2 issues unknown to us. Amazing work, Dr. @odedrechavi.bsky.social and team. 👌👌👌
November 9, 2025 at 7:32 AM
Tried @qedscience.bsky.social by running our published paper through it. It identified 2 issues unknown to us. Amazing work, Dr. @odedrechavi.bsky.social and team. 👌👌👌
Reposted
The support from @embopress.org and @reviewcommons.org means a lot! Thank you @tlemberger.bsky.social ! @qedscience.bsky.social
Very cool! I agree AI scientific review can be useful if it is transparent. It is all progressing very fast and will change everything. @qedScience @bioRxiv is a great first step. We are doing some human-based eval, so more soon from @EMBOPress @ReviewCommons with @qedScience. Watch this space ;-)
Excited to launch an openRxiv partnership with the scientist-run AI review service qed (@qedscience.bsky.social), the brainchild of @odedrechavi.bsky.social 1/n
openrxiv.org/enabling-rev...
openrxiv.org/enabling-rev...
November 6, 2025 at 3:47 PM
The support from @embopress.org and @reviewcommons.org means a lot! Thank you @tlemberger.bsky.social ! @qedscience.bsky.social
Reposted
Enabling options for review: bioRxiv authors now have the option to send their preprints directly to @qedscience.bsky.social , an authors-centered AI review platform, for automated feedback on their paper.
openrxiv.org/enabling-rev...
#OpenScience #Preprints #openrxiv #qedscience #biorxiv
openrxiv.org/enabling-rev...
#OpenScience #Preprints #openrxiv #qedscience #biorxiv
November 6, 2025 at 2:42 PM
Enabling options for review: bioRxiv authors now have the option to send their preprints directly to @qedscience.bsky.social , an authors-centered AI review platform, for automated feedback on their paper.
openrxiv.org/enabling-rev...
#OpenScience #Preprints #openrxiv #qedscience #biorxiv
openrxiv.org/enabling-rev...
#OpenScience #Preprints #openrxiv #qedscience #biorxiv
Reposted
Excited to launch an openRxiv partnership with the scientist-run AI review service qed (@qedscience.bsky.social), the brainchild of @odedrechavi.bsky.social 1/n
openrxiv.org/enabling-rev...
openrxiv.org/enabling-rev...
Enabling options for review: from training and transparency to author-centered AI tools - openRxiv
Peer review is widely viewed as a critical aspect of biomedical communication. Ideally, it provides authors with feedback so they can improve manuscripts and gives readers, particularly nonspecialists...
openrxiv.org
November 6, 2025 at 2:32 PM
Excited to launch an openRxiv partnership with the scientist-run AI review service qed (@qedscience.bsky.social), the brainchild of @odedrechavi.bsky.social 1/n
openrxiv.org/enabling-rev...
openrxiv.org/enabling-rev...
Reposted
IT'S HAPPENING! 💥 I'm psyched to launch the collaboration between @qedscience.bsky.social & @openrxiv.bsky.social @biorxivpreprint.bsky.social! Preprint + q.e.d = your science is out there, and anyone can appreciate it. Let's care about making discoveries, and not on “getting published” (1/3) 👇
November 6, 2025 at 2:49 PM
IT'S HAPPENING! 💥 I'm psyched to launch the collaboration between @qedscience.bsky.social & @openrxiv.bsky.social @biorxivpreprint.bsky.social! Preprint + q.e.d = your science is out there, and anyone can appreciate it. Let's care about making discoveries, and not on “getting published” (1/3) 👇
Reposted
Let's go! Super excited to partner with @richardsever.bsky.social and the fantastic @openrxiv.bsky.social team - Preprints have been the best thing that happened to science publishing during my lifetime, and we're happy @qedscience.bsky.social can make preprints do more 👊
November 6, 2025 at 2:52 PM
Let's go! Super excited to partner with @richardsever.bsky.social and the fantastic @openrxiv.bsky.social team - Preprints have been the best thing that happened to science publishing during my lifetime, and we're happy @qedscience.bsky.social can make preprints do more 👊
We’re thrilled to share that @openrxiv.bsky.social and @biorxiv-medrxiv.bsky.social now integrate @qedscience.bsky.social. This collaboration reflects a shared effort to make scientific evaluation more transparent and constructive.
Enabling options for review: bioRxiv authors now have the option to send their preprints directly to @qedscience.bsky.social , an authors-centered AI review platform, for automated feedback on their paper.
openrxiv.org/enabling-rev...
#OpenScience #Preprints #openrxiv #qedscience #biorxiv
openrxiv.org/enabling-rev...
#OpenScience #Preprints #openrxiv #qedscience #biorxiv
November 6, 2025 at 2:51 PM
We’re thrilled to share that @openrxiv.bsky.social and @biorxiv-medrxiv.bsky.social now integrate @qedscience.bsky.social. This collaboration reflects a shared effort to make scientific evaluation more transparent and constructive.
Reposted
Stay tuned for an important update later today! @qedscience.bsky.social
a man standing in front of a sign that says believe i believe in you
ALT: a man standing in front of a sign that says believe i believe in you
media.tenor.com
November 6, 2025 at 8:28 AM
Stay tuned for an important update later today! @qedscience.bsky.social
Reposted
More exciting news from qed next week!
BIG ANNOUNCEMENT📣: I haven’t been this excited to be part of something new in 15 years… Thrilled to reveal the passion project I’ve been working on for the past year and a half!🙀🥳 (thread 👇)
October 30, 2025 at 7:23 AM
More exciting news from qed next week!