https://GeoEnergyMath.com
https://github.com/orgs/azimuth-project/discussions
Despite being obvious, no one has ever tried doing this in the research lit.
AMO trained on region outside of dashed line, so that's the cross-validated region, using Descent optimized LTE annual time-series, Python python3 ts_lte.py amo.dat --cc --plot --low 1930 --high 1960 using the following JSON parameters file amo.dat.p { "Aliased": [ 0.422362756,…
AMO trained on region outside of dashed line, so that's the cross-validated region, using Descent optimized LTE annual time-series, Python python3 ts_lte.py amo.dat --cc --plot --low 1930 --high 1960 using the following JSON parameters file amo.dat.p { "Aliased": [ 0.422362756,…
pukite.substack.com/p/mean-sea-l...
pukite.substack.com/p/mean-sea-l...
My contribution wasn't used:
> "I truly regret that I wasn't able to include information from our correspondence in the final article. Candidly, I was overwhelmed by the multitude of people who wanted to speak about this issue for my story
My contribution wasn't used:
> "I truly regret that I wasn't able to include information from our correspondence in the final article. Candidly, I was overwhelmed by the multitude of people who wanted to speak about this issue for my story
agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....
staff.cgd.ucar.edu/cdeser/docs/...
agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....
staff.cgd.ucar.edu/cdeser/docs/...
Using LLMs to argue against crank/ crackpot science is a net benefit. But what happens when the LLMs start to support "outlier" ideas that happen to fit into the stochastic logical framework that an LLM operates in?
chatgpt.com/share/68c568...
chatgpt.com/share/68c568...
chatgpt.com/share/68c568...
... continued from last post. The last set of cross-validation results are based on training of held-out data for intervals outside of 0.6-0.8 (i.e. training on t0.8 of the data, which extends from t=0.0 to t=1.0 normalized). This post considers…
... continued from last post. The last set of cross-validation results are based on training of held-out data for intervals outside of 0.6-0.8 (i.e. training on t0.8 of the data, which extends from t=0.0 to t=1.0 normalized). This post considers…
... continued from last post. Each fitted model result shows the cross-validation results based on training of held-out data -- i.e. training on only the intervals outside of 0.6-0.8 (i.e. training on t0.8 of the data, which extends from t=0.0 to t=1.0…
... continued from last post. Each fitted model result shows the cross-validation results based on training of held-out data -- i.e. training on only the intervals outside of 0.6-0.8 (i.e. training on t0.8 of the data, which extends from t=0.0 to t=1.0…
hint : planetary = lunar + small planetary
Full article: Evaluation and prediction of the effects of planetary orbital variations to earth’s temperature changes www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
hint : planetary = lunar + small planetary
Full article: Evaluation and prediction of the effects of planetary orbital variations to earth’s temperature changes www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....
This article in MIT News: "New research shows the natural variability in climate data can cause AI models to struggle at predicting local temperature and rainfall." ... "While deep learning has become increasingly popular for…
This article in MIT News: "New research shows the natural variability in climate data can cause AI models to struggle at predicting local temperature and rainfall." ... "While deep learning has become increasingly popular for…
www.youtube.com/watch?v=CbO2...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=CbO2...
Cross-validated interval is dashed. Access to 100 other sites with >100y spans. Need this duration for long-period tides
Cross-validated interval is dashed. Access to 100 other sites with >100y spans. Need this duration for long-period tides