Ohhh, that makes a lot of sense. I think I just rarely care much about outputs at critical numbers outside of the context of plotting the points on a graph, so I use numbers and values interchangeably.

Ooh, how do you define the first two? I would have said the first two are the same thing, but not the third.

Why stop there? Put me in charge, and I'll make sure the red line has 3+4i minute headways all day, and 2-i minutes at peak.

The other two pictures that didn't post:

Oh, that's a really smart idea.

Incidentally, fantastic choice of basic energies to use 🙂

Mine has a pretty sizable share of Gardy too. Bit less of Pult.

At my cup last weekend, I played Zard, 3 Gardy in a row, and Ethan's Typhlosion in Swiss, then Zard and TordBox in cut.

On the other hand, while Gardy especially is perennially popular, it does seem like we've pretty consistently had formats where a lot of different decks are capable of doing well, and I'm really, really happy about that.

This seems to happen around this time of year sort of regularly now, it feels similar to how Lugia would just never go away. Maybe the longer rotation period (cards stay in for up to 3 years now instead of about 2.5) is partly to blame?

Congrats, that's quite the run in phase 2!

Oh jeez, if the Limitless predictor is to be believed, there's a nontrivial (though probably not high) chance that top cut hits the 16-person limit and people bubble out.

Yeah, whenever I think of UW's curriculum, I have to remind myself that their Calc 1-2 is a 9-credit sequence, so nominally can cover something like 50% more material than mine.

Yeah, when I TA'ed at UW, my impression was that the calc courses were jam packed with material, but even then, no normal line.