폴선생님
LightNews LightNews
banner
poli1436.bsky.social
폴선생님
@poli1436.bsky.social
52 followers 30 following 520 posts
트위터 도망자/많은 애호/스스로 불러온 재앙에 짓눌려
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted by 폴선생님
gregsargent.bsky.social
An interesting pattern: Two Trump-appointed judges have now declared that Trump does not have the power to simply invent emergencies by decree.

This is the real reason Stephen Miller and others are so furious. It's *that* power that they want for Trump.

newrepublic.com/article/1959...
May 30, 2025 at 6:06 PM
Reposted by 폴선생님
fritschner.bsky.social
*Sector-based tariffs (lumber, steel, copper, and more tk including chips, pharmaceuticals etc) use a different authority, Section 232, which are unaffected by this ruling
May 28, 2025 at 11:36 PM
Reposted by 폴선생님
fritschner.bsky.social
All of those tariffs are vacated “and their operation permanently enjoined.” There isn’t a delay unless a higher court grants one on appeal by the administration. Trump loses, most* of his tariffs are removed
May 28, 2025 at 11:35 PM
Reposted by 폴선생님
jamellebouie.net
like, this is just total horseshit. and people are impressed by this level of reasoning! they think vance is sophisticated and nuanced!
But this point is interesting to me. There are two things about my boss — and I never reveal private conversations — there are two things about the president of the United States that I am extremely fascinated by. One is he has better instincts about human beings than anybody that I’ve ever met. Just almost a bizarre level of intuition about people. Second, which I think is very underappreciated and it motivates the foreign policy in Ukraine and Russia, it motivates the things that he said about the Middle East, it motivates really a lot of them, is he has this sort of humanitarian impulse. And I’ve heard the president say: Maybe if we sent the very worst people to different places, then American prisons would be a little less violent. Because as you know, American prisons are not a good place. They’re not very good at rehabilitation. I think we overstate how much people go to prison for truly petty crime, but they go in there for something that should at least give them an opportunity for a second chance. They end up getting stabbed while they’re in prison. So the idea that there is just something fundamentally inhumane about sending a very violent person to another prison outside of the country, I don’t buy that. I don’t think that’s what motivates the president. And again, that’s a separate question from whether it’s legal, which the president’s been very clear he would follow the law.
May 21, 2025 at 12:24 PM
Reposted by 폴선생님
sahilkapur.bsky.social
tl;dr —> ACA expanded Medicaid to 138% of the poverty level with a promise: feds pay 90% of the cost. That’s central to 40+ states adopting expansion and insuring ~20 million. If that 90% is cut, states must either raise taxes, slash programs or remove residents from Medicaid.
April 29, 2025 at 1:14 AM
Reposted by 폴선생님
lizdye.bsky.social
OMG the written order is even better
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
The Defendants ask this Court to extend the deadline to respond to its Order at ECF No. 51, arguing that the Defendants require several days to “meaningful[ly] review the Supreme Court’s decision,” issued last night at 7:00 PM, and that it is “impracticable for Defendants to comply with the Court’s 9:30 AM deadline only a few hours after the Supreme Court issued an order in this case.” ECF No. 55. This, Defendants say, supports extension of the filing deadline until April 15, 2025. The Court largely rejects the Defendants’ request. First, the Defendants’ act of sending Abrego Garcia to El Salvador was wholly illegal from the moment it happened, and Defendants have been on notice of the same. Indeed, as the Supreme Court credits, “the United States acknowledges that Abrego Garcia was subject to a withholding order forbidding his removal to El Salvador, and that the removal to El Salvador was therefore illegal.” Noem v. Abrego Garcia, 604 U.S. ____ (2025), Slip Op. at 1. Second, the Defendants’ suggestion that they need time to meaningfully review a four-page Order that reaffirms this basic principle blinks at reality. Third, the Defendants misconstrue the Supreme Court’s Order stating that the original deadline at ECF No. 21 is “no longer effective,” as somehow suggesting that the Court’s amended Order requiring prompt attention to this matter is “inconsistent” with the Supreme Court’s directive. Nothing could be further from the truth. As the Supreme Court plainly stated, “the Government should be prepared to share what it can concerning the steps it has taken and the prospect of further steps,” Slip Op. at 2—all against the backdrop of this Court’s needing to “ensure that the Government lives up to its obligations to follow the law.” Id. at 4 (Sotomayor, J., concurring). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS in part the request and will extend the filing deadline until 11:30 AM today. The hearing date and time will remain unchanged. April 11, 2025 /S/ Date Paula Xinis United States District Judge
April 11, 2025 at 2:43 PM