Peter
LightNews LightNews
plawman.bsky.social
Peter
@plawman.bsky.social
1.1K followers 510 following 2.4K posts
What murda?
Posts Replies Media Videos
plawman.bsky.social
I read this in the style of the Arrested Development intro
November 15, 2025 at 1:38 AM
plawman.bsky.social
The entire anti-Zohran campaign was a cesspool of identity politics and he won by doing exactly what pundits claim Democrats should do but didn’t like it when Zohran did those things because…reasons
November 15, 2025 at 1:35 AM
plawman.bsky.social
You’d think the self-ordained free speech crusader would have used his platform to write our current government actually violating the First Amendment and unconstitutionally cracking down on free speech at colleges and universities
gabrielmalor.bsky.social Gabriel Malor @gabrielmalor.bsky.social · 5d
Fed. judge holds that the Trump administration engaged in coercive and retaliatory conduct in violation of the First and Tenth Amendments in its pretextual attacks on the University of California system.

PI granted.

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
Defendants do not deny any of this. Instead, their principal argument is that the UC might not agree to the proposed conditions for restoring funding, so Plaintiffs’ present case is too speculative to be heard. But Plaintiffs’ harm is already very real. With every day that passes, UCLA continues to be denied the chance to win new grants, ratchetting up Defendants’ pressure campaign. And numerous UC faculty and staff have submitted declarations describing how Defendants’ actions have already chilled speech throughout the UC system. They describe how they have stopped teaching or researching topics they are afraid are too “left” or “woke,” in order to avoid triggering further funding cancellations by Defendants. They also give examples of projects the UC has stopped due to fear of the same reprisals. These are classic, predictable First Amendment harms, and exactly what Defendants publicly said that they intended. The undisputed record demonstrates that Defendants have engaged in coercive and Case 3:25-cv-07864-RFL Document 90 Filed 11/14/25 Page 2 of 76 3 retaliatory conduct in violation of the First Amendment and Tenth Amendment. It also shows that they have flouted the requirements of Title VI and IX and cancelled funding in an arbitrary and capricious manner while ignoring required procedural safeguards. None of the jurisdictional
November 15, 2025 at 1:25 AM
plawman.bsky.social
If only those insurance companies were a failing far-right Argentinian leader
November 8, 2025 at 3:34 PM