Olivia Kirtley
banner
oliviajkirtley.bsky.social
Olivia Kirtley
@oliviajkirtley.bsky.social
Assistant Research Professor & Co-Director, Center for Contextual Psychiatry, KU Leuven. Adolescent #mentalhealth, experience sampling, #SelfHarm & #suicide researcher, #OpenScience. All views my own.
Reposted by Olivia Kirtley
🆕Please Share!

Save the Date: 10th Suicide and Self-harm Early and Mid-Career Researchers' Forum, 11-12 June 2026 #EMCRF2026

Check back for details in due course: www.suicideresearch.info
November 5, 2025 at 7:06 PM
Reposted by Olivia Kirtley
Dear PsyArXiv users,
The moderation functions on the OSF platform, which hosts PsyArXiv, have been repaired. 🔧

We are working to moderate any submissions that have been delayed, and expect a return to normal moderation wait times (24-72hs) soon.

Thank you for your patience!
October 17, 2025 at 2:45 PM
Reposted by Olivia Kirtley
Dear PsyArXiv users!
The OSF platform, which hosts PsyArXiv, has updated the PsyArXiv user interface! Unfortunately, some key moderation functions need repairs after the upgrade. This will delay some moderation decisions this week. 🔧

Thank you for your patience!
October 13, 2025 at 12:57 AM
Reposted by Olivia Kirtley
My blog has moved! It’s now at sometimesimwrongblog.wordpress.com If you have links to posts in your syllabus, let me know if you have any trouble finding the corresponding post!
October 7, 2025 at 7:49 PM
Reposted by Olivia Kirtley
Are you an ESM item measuring the quality of social experiences looking for validation? 👀

Because if you are, I've got some bad news for you. Our new preprint is out: osf.io/preprints/ps...

@gudruneisele.bsky.social @ginettelafit.bsky.social @lisapeeters.bsky.social @oliviajkirtley.bsky.social
OSF
osf.io
September 29, 2025 at 7:29 PM
Reposted by Olivia Kirtley
Don't let minor submission errors delay the publication of your research! 📝 🔬

Remember to check the full guidelines when submitting the manuscript to PsyArXiv (buff.ly/M3cRBW2).

Below, we also have a few friendly reminders!
September 30, 2025 at 1:03 PM
Reposted by Olivia Kirtley
Open Science Workshop - detecting errors and misconduct in science
Dates: 20-22 October
Location: Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Registration link: tinyurl.com/3xkd8twf
ONLY PHYSICAL ATTENDENCE POSSIBLE! NO ONLINE POSSIBILITIES.
September 29, 2025 at 10:38 AM
Reposted by Olivia Kirtley
The first preprint of my PhD is out! Our review maps choices that researchers make throughout an ESM study from start to finish, including reporting and open science practices. We compare our findings to previous literature where possible, but also provide novel insights! osf.io/preprints/ps...
OSF
osf.io
September 23, 2025 at 3:58 PM
Reposted by Olivia Kirtley
🥳 PsyArXiv is back to normal operations 🥳

Thanks to the fantastic team of moderators (thank you all🙏), PsyArXiv has resumed normal operations. You can expect any newly posted or edited preprint to be moderated within 24-72 hours of submission.

Learn more from our blog post👇
buff.ly/OtpsKhm
September 18, 2025 at 2:12 PM
Reposted by Olivia Kirtley
Is your preprint still pending moderation? See our recent post about how to make sure getting it approved is a smooth process:
bsky.app/profile/impr...

(pro tip: you can make edits even while it's in the moderation queue!)
(1) Only submit to PsyArXiv if your contribution is within scope. Is it scholarly, and is it psychology?

(2) Include a title page with a descriptive title, all authors' names, and a contact email.
August 30, 2025 at 10:02 PM
Reposted by Olivia Kirtley
PsyArXiv is now down to only ~40% of the backlog we started with, thanks to our amazing moderators 🎉 To all mods: thank you so much for your hard work!

Did one of your preprints get approved recently? Help us show our thanks by liking and sharing this post :)

#PsyArXiv #PsychSciSky
August 30, 2025 at 10:02 PM
Reposted by Olivia Kirtley
Just passed 25% of the backlog cleared 🎉🎉🎉

The dedication of our volunteers is impressive!

Mods: Please feel free to come to office hours on Monday if you want to work in community.

Mods-to-be: Hope to see you at Training #3 at 8 pm ET!
We are in awe of our community's response -- over 300 people have volunteered to moderate PsyArXiv! We’ve already cleared 13% of the backlog and expect to make even faster progress next week. Thank you for your patience as we work through this, and special thanks to our volunteers! 🎉 #PsychSciSky
August 24, 2025 at 2:09 AM
Reposted by Olivia Kirtley
New and improved 😆 Those who were at the first training will know we needed to 🤦‍♀️

See you tomorrow, we're so thrilled to see all of the interest in supporting @psyarxivbot.bsky.social
August 21, 2025 at 10:26 PM
Reposted by Olivia Kirtley
🧠🧠🧠 PsyArXiv needs you! Please sign up to join our moderator team. First cohort is getting trained on next Monday, with more trainings to come. Easy way to give back to this crucial community resource. Students, postdocs, faculty, all welcome - come one and all!
August 15, 2025 at 6:01 PM
Reposted by Olivia Kirtley
My conclusion from this is that preprint servers (and journals!) are entering a new phase of cat and mouse trying to contain AI slop (n.b., not mundane AI use, but nonsense generation). Peer review as a filter scarcely does better to ID this stuff. We need new & better tools to ID trustworthy works.
Preprint servers are strugging with an influx of AI content. "How do you do quality assurance while keeping things relatively light touch so the system doesn’t collapse on itself?"
by Traci Watson | @nature.com

www.nature.com/articles/d41...
AI content is tainting preprints: how moderators are fighting back
Preprint servers are seeing a rise in submissions seemingly produced by paper mills or with help from AI tools.
www.nature.com
August 12, 2025 at 5:34 PM
Thoughtful piece about the influx of suspicious #preprints (some involving AI) to PsyArXiv & other preprint servers. Wee mention of me and some of the preprint monitoring I've been doing in collaboration with PsyArXiv. Servers are not going to take this lying down. #OpenScience
August 13, 2025 at 2:01 PM
Reposted by Olivia Kirtley
Does anyone know of a direct comparison between EU countries in terms of metrics used to evaluate universities and/or academic researchers? I'm especially interested in whether one can contrast countries that use N publications with those that don't. I suspect it's not so simple though
August 5, 2025 at 4:22 PM
Reposted by Olivia Kirtley
A new study, based on an analysis of thousands of publications and their authors and editors, shows paper mills are just part of a complex, interconnected system that includes publishers, journals, and brokers. scim.ag/3H9kwwQ
Scientific fraud has become an ‘industry,’ alarming analysis finds
Sophisticated global networks are infiltrating journals to publish fake papers
scim.ag
August 4, 2025 at 7:15 PM
Watching to see if my code will stall or keep grinding through downloading preprints with the OSF API is *almost* as tense as last night's penalties... 🙃. #OpenScience
July 28, 2025 at 6:23 PM
Reposted by Olivia Kirtley
🆕 Following requests from authors, we have increased the word limit for all regular papers in Archives of Suicide Research to 5,000 words (Introduction, Methods, Results & Discussion)
July 28, 2025 at 8:10 AM
Glad to see @cos.io coming out with a statement about this after an influx of suspicious preprints hit PsyArXiv at the start of July. Many more have appeared since the first one I spotted. I Automated checks can only go so far & documenting all of them is a lot of work. #OpenScience
Open infrastructures align transparency and rigor. By increasing the ease of sharing, researchers are more accountable to rigor, and readers are better able to evaluate it.

AI can upset that alignment creating a big challenge for open infrastructure.

www.cos.io/blog/evaluat...
A Shared Challenge: Evaluating AI’s Impact on Open Research Infrastructure
OSF was designed to make open scholarship possible and easy to adopt, while upholding the values of transparency, credibility, and accountability. As we navigate the evolving role of AI in research, C...
www.cos.io
July 26, 2025 at 1:21 PM
Reposted by Olivia Kirtley
I've been working on follow-up to When It Is Darkest, after a hiatus.

When I published When It Is Darkest, I did so without an agent.

But I think that an agent would really help for book #2.

If you're an agent or know an agent who might be interested in representing me, please get in touch.
🙏
July 25, 2025 at 8:15 PM
Reposted by Olivia Kirtley
Nature News has a short piece on the survey we did in conjunction with the FAIRS meeting on responding to serious research misconduct www.nature.com/articles/d41...
How to tackle research misconduct: survey finds stark disagreement
Data sleuths and research-integrity officers have different views on how to handle allegations of wrongdoing in science.
www.nature.com
July 26, 2025 at 8:26 AM
Reposted by Olivia Kirtley
Lonni Besançon faced online abuse, threats and legal challenges in response to his research integrity sleuthing during the COVID-19 pandemic

go.nature.com/4m5DN0X
The COVID-19 pandemic transformed this scientist into a research-integrity sleuth
Lonni Besançon has faced online abuse, threats and legal challenges. But he remains proud of his service to science and society.
go.nature.com
July 22, 2025 at 1:20 PM
Reposted by Olivia Kirtley
New blogpost. The shitshow that results when a publisher fails to check up on their peer reviewers, with authors caught up in a nightmare process. deevybee.blogspot.com/2025/07/trou...
Trouble at t' (review) mill: How MDPI lets down authors
I guess many readers will have had peer reviews where the reviewer doesn't appear to have understood, or even properly read, the paper they...
deevybee.blogspot.com
July 21, 2025 at 8:45 AM