Read the journal article here "The Language of Manipulation: Linguistic Manifestations of (Inter)Subjectivity and Affect in Distorted Communication in the Lithuanian Political Discourse" by Viktorija Mažeikienė: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

Thanks for your reply Margo! We'll also make a recording available. Have fun at your conference!

This report was really interesting to read: melbourne-cshe.unimelb.edu.au/__data/asset... and I'm keen to learn more.

And I notice slight differences with publisher policies when it comes to 'declaring' gen AI use. So again, context is everything :)

I forgot to highlight context in my earlier response. I'm always reading the AI policies of the publishers I want to submit articles to: au.sagepub.com/en-gb/oce/ar... www.springer.com/gp/editorial... - these policies distinguish between AI-assisted copy editing and gen AI for content creation.

This is an example of our acknowledgement statements: answers.library.westernsydney.edu.au/loader?fid=1... Prompts can be included in an appendix. Placement of the statement depends on context (e.g. at the start if its a thesis).

My university has moved towards acknowledgement statements of gen AI use. We shouldn't really be "copying and pasting" gen AI text anyway and as already mentioned, gen AI shouldn't be the original source. Output from gen AI tools can be non-recoverable so that is another issue.