Alex, the modest
@officialgott.bsky.social
Reposted by Alex, the modest
Diese Woche wurde ich erstmals in einem Interview mit einem Sender des ÖRR bei einer Äußerung zum Geschichtsrevisionismus gebeten, die #AfD nicht explizit zu erwähnen. Begründung: Das wird sonst nicht gesendet.
Die AfD will die öffentlich-rechtlichen Medien abschaffen. Doch die größte Gefahr liegt woanders. Die Sender sind von innen heraus bedroht.
Debatte über Öffentlich-Rechtliche: Hier läuft etwas schief
taz.de
April 20, 2025 at 9:06 PM
Diese Woche wurde ich erstmals in einem Interview mit einem Sender des ÖRR bei einer Äußerung zum Geschichtsrevisionismus gebeten, die #AfD nicht explizit zu erwähnen. Begründung: Das wird sonst nicht gesendet.
Reposted by Alex, the modest
Guten Morgen! Eigentlich wollten Matze & ich nur mal einchecken & überlegen, was wir nun mit diesem politischen Heckmeck machen & wie Vertrauen zurückkommen kann.
Also eine Suche nach Balance zwischen Engagement & Auftanken, Kritik & Einladung- mit Musik.
www.ffh.de/podcast/4048...
Also eine Suche nach Balance zwischen Engagement & Auftanken, Kritik & Einladung- mit Musik.
www.ffh.de/podcast/4048...
Maja Göpel (2025) - Wie gewinne ich das Vertrauen in die Politik zurück? - Hotel Matze
Maja ist Transformationsforscherin, Politökonomin und Nachhaltigkeitsexpertin.
Gerade erschien ihr neuestes Buch Werte. Ein Kompass für die Zukunft.
Das erste
www.ffh.de
March 17, 2025 at 7:33 AM
Guten Morgen! Eigentlich wollten Matze & ich nur mal einchecken & überlegen, was wir nun mit diesem politischen Heckmeck machen & wie Vertrauen zurückkommen kann.
Also eine Suche nach Balance zwischen Engagement & Auftanken, Kritik & Einladung- mit Musik.
www.ffh.de/podcast/4048...
Also eine Suche nach Balance zwischen Engagement & Auftanken, Kritik & Einladung- mit Musik.
www.ffh.de/podcast/4048...
Reposted by Alex, the modest
I am a climate scientist and this is correct ⬇️
Occasional reminder that there’s no, “it’s too late, its over” for anthropogenic climate change. Every molecule of CO2 that doesn’t go into the atmosphere makes a difference. Preventing 0.1 degree of warming makes a difference. Every bit of climate resilience we build together makes a difference.
January 9, 2025 at 3:06 AM
I am a climate scientist and this is correct ⬇️
Reposted by Alex, the modest
Predictive text models do not ever "answer your question"
They predict what an answer to your question would probably look like.
Which is very, very, very different
They predict what an answer to your question would probably look like.
Which is very, very, very different
I don’t think it can be emphasized enough that large language models were never intended to do math or know facts; literally all they do is attempt to sound like the text they’re given, which may or may not include math or facts. They don’t do logic or fact checking — they’re just not built for that
Unfortunately, it repeatedly offers incorrect answers for straightforward math questions. 🧪
March 18, 2024 at 12:45 PM
Predictive text models do not ever "answer your question"
They predict what an answer to your question would probably look like.
Which is very, very, very different
They predict what an answer to your question would probably look like.
Which is very, very, very different
Reposted by Alex, the modest
How long would your commute take in 1680? Mine would be about a day and a half.
@camunicampop.bsky.social has a brilliant tool for calculating travel times in Roman, 1680, 1830, 1911 and 2024. 🗃️
www.travelintimes.org/journey/52.2...
@camunicampop.bsky.social has a brilliant tool for calculating travel times in Roman, 1680, 1830, 1911 and 2024. 🗃️
www.travelintimes.org/journey/52.2...
November 22, 2024 at 9:49 AM
How long would your commute take in 1680? Mine would be about a day and a half.
@camunicampop.bsky.social has a brilliant tool for calculating travel times in Roman, 1680, 1830, 1911 and 2024. 🗃️
www.travelintimes.org/journey/52.2...
@camunicampop.bsky.social has a brilliant tool for calculating travel times in Roman, 1680, 1830, 1911 and 2024. 🗃️
www.travelintimes.org/journey/52.2...
Reposted by Alex, the modest
So I did copy and steal this and it was awesome! So much discussion and interaction, and relieved laughter, and made for the highlight of my week. Try this! 👇🏻
September 5, 2024 at 6:04 PM
So I did copy and steal this and it was awesome! So much discussion and interaction, and relieved laughter, and made for the highlight of my week. Try this! 👇🏻
Reposted by Alex, the modest
Using AI to write science explainers is bad for SO MANY REASONS relating to accuracy and content theft but also because effective science communication is not about just arranging information on a page, but allowing the science to create a connection between people, the basis of which is trust
Forgot to share this earlier, but YIKES. Jackson Ryan on the AI-generated articles in Cosmos magazine www.theguardian.com/...
Cosmos magazine’s AI-generated articles are bad for trust in science | Jackson Ryan
Rolling out an AI experiment with a lack of transparency is at best ignorant, and at worst dangerous
www.theguardian.com
August 14, 2024 at 11:49 AM
Using AI to write science explainers is bad for SO MANY REASONS relating to accuracy and content theft but also because effective science communication is not about just arranging information on a page, but allowing the science to create a connection between people, the basis of which is trust