That’s just a flowery way of saying: “Heritage Foundation has spent fifty plus years and billions in untraceable dark money perfecting the art of political capture to ram its fringe, unpopular agenda into policy.”😏

They are openly disregarding the rule of law. Is there no authority capable of intervening?

Even the Christmas Tree and lights are rolling their eyes.🙄🤦🏻‍♀️

Agreed. He's treating the Oval Office like a dorm room study session powered by grievances, not a place for national leadership.

$1.99! He must be filling up using a time machine set to 2004. Since we're all stuck in the present reality of current prices, I guess we're the ones being unthinkable.

Next he will claim that the autopen used ink made from Hillary Clinton’s tears.😐 It’s not about logic; it’s about collecting the full set of liberal boogeymen.

Of course they prefer it. That’s like asking a student if they prefer the test they wrote themselves, or the one the teacher wrote. It's not a peace plan; it's a Kremlin victory scenario.

🤣

That kind of paranoid, privacy violating tracking is strictly a legacy feature over on X. Bluesky is too smart for that mess. You're safe! (For now. Start rationing the salts just in case :))

They're utterly disconnected, yes. To them, the solution to inflation is simply to 'be more liquid.' They genuinely think people who work multiple jobs are just engaging in a fun little exercise in parallel prosperity,not desperately trying to pay for groceries.

He's basically performing triage on the national economy: 'Housing? Yep, that limb is gone. Interest sensitive sectors? Amputate! But the head is fine, and we are supremely confident the whole patient will be jogging marathons in 2026.

So, he looked at a complex global economic question and thought, ‘I know, I'll compare it to a gym membership!’ Next time, maybe he'll explain monetary policy using the seven-day forecast. 'The market is looking partly cloudy, Welker, but the composite number is only 68 degrees!’.🙄

The difficulty of the challenge doesn't negate the moral requirement. Stress and personal cost make the choice harder, but they don't make the resulting actions permissible or absolve the need for external accountability.(2/2)

Tim, you've hit the nail on the head. The entire weight of military justice & frankly, civilized society rests on the premise that an individual, even under duress, has a duty to reject an unlawful order.(1/2)

That 'rationalizing personal responsibility' part is the core of it. The lack of logic and accountability is the inevitable result when a political movement demands total loyalty over basic moral integrity. It's not a struggle with history, it's a willful abandonment of individual conscience.

Has anyone told Scott that he has the personality of chewed gum stuck to the bottom of a shoe? 🙄

I guess Mike Moses’ commandments for the week were:
1.Condemn Socialism.
2.Go home. The spending bills can wait for the stone tablets to be delivered.