123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234
To whom, exactly? Asa Earl Carter?
To whom, exactly? Asa Earl Carter?
This is not self harm.
This is not self harm.
1line tests STRONGLY mislead about capabilities of modelS! Router model sits inbetween, sends I/O to different models to save $
gpt-5-chat-latest ≠
gpt-5-2025-08-07 (+cutoff dates differ)
gpt-5-main-* ≠ gpt-5-thinking-*
cf. system card linked below
Cc @ceperez.bsky.social
1line tests STRONGLY mislead about capabilities of modelS! Router model sits inbetween, sends I/O to different models to save $
gpt-5-chat-latest ≠
gpt-5-2025-08-07 (+cutoff dates differ)
gpt-5-main-* ≠ gpt-5-thinking-*
cf. system card linked below
Cc @ceperez.bsky.social
"We do continuous valuation on behavioral surplus from your data"
Ain't like they say *honor* it, right?
Nice injoke+cognitive dissonance dodging mechanism innit 🤡
➡️how sociopath execs sith mind wrangle m.manager narcissists(≈M. Scott)
"We do continuous valuation on behavioral surplus from your data"
Ain't like they say *honor* it, right?
Nice injoke+cognitive dissonance dodging mechanism innit 🤡
➡️how sociopath execs sith mind wrangle m.manager narcissists(≈M. Scott)
"We do continuous valuation on behavioral surplus from your data"
Ain't like they say *honor* it, right?
Nice injoke+cognitive dissonance dodging mechanism innit 🤡
➡️how sociopath execs sith mind wrangle m.manager narcissists(≈M. Scott)
"We do continuous valuation on behavioral surplus from your data"
Ain't like they say *honor* it, right?
Nice injoke+cognitive dissonance dodging mechanism innit 🤡
➡️how sociopath execs sith mind wrangle m.manager narcissists(≈M. Scott)
OT1H, for one to even evaluate what that'd now imply, sufficiently clueful definitions of "browser"'d have to exist AFAICT
OTOH, "more appropriate" seems like an isomorphic-to-"a bit pregnant" oxymoron
OTGH, Chromium, W3C, & Mozilla trajectories leave little choice, no? 😕
OT1H, for one to even evaluate what that'd now imply, sufficiently clueful definitions of "browser"'d have to exist AFAICT
OTOH, "more appropriate" seems like an isomorphic-to-"a bit pregnant" oxymoron
OTGH, Chromium, W3C, & Mozilla trajectories leave little choice, no? 😕