nelsonsteelberg.bsky.social
@nelsonsteelberg.bsky.social
WTAF
Another abominable editorial from the Wash Post
November 3, 2025 at 6:25 PM
WTAF
Everyone "just following orders" needs to be held accountable.
In the past two months, Donald J. Trump and Pete Hegseth have murdered 43 people.
U.S. Deploys Aircraft Carrier to Latin America, a Major Escalation
www.nytimes.com
October 25, 2025 at 1:27 PM
Everyone "just following orders" needs to be held accountable.
Man concerned about "rhetoric" says "the bloodshed is not over" if the rhetoric does not stop.
Homan: "At the No Kings protest, I watched more of the rhetoric. They've lost their minds. And I tell you: the bloodshed is not over if we don't address the rhetoric."
October 22, 2025 at 6:45 PM
Man concerned about "rhetoric" says "the bloodshed is not over" if the rhetoric does not stop.
@politico.com You can see how this makes you look like hacks, right?
October 8, 2025 at 7:29 PM
@politico.com You can see how this makes you look like hacks, right?
If you see this, quote with a robot that isn't from Star Wars, Star Trek, Doctor Who, or Transformers.
July 11, 2025 at 3:24 AM
If you see this, quote with a robot that isn't from Star Wars, Star Trek, Doctor Who, or Transformers.
One thing that I haven't seen said in the last 24 hours is that the Democratic Party had an opportunity, as an institution, to help shape, foster, and direct the grassroots popular uprising against Trump II.
They made a conscious decision not to.
They made a conscious decision not to.
June 10, 2025 at 2:32 AM
If you see this, Quote Post a TV show with an awesome theme tune/song
youtu.be/Tp1bEpmmGMs?...
youtu.be/Tp1bEpmmGMs?...
June 4, 2025 at 5:35 AM
If you see this, Quote Post a TV show with an awesome theme tune/song
youtu.be/Tp1bEpmmGMs?...
youtu.be/Tp1bEpmmGMs?...
@ericlipton.nytimes.com amplifying this. Why is it a stunt? Is it because it doesn't have a hope of going anywhere in the GOP-controlled House? Calling it a stunt implies it's a waste of time. Is that what you meant?
why is it a "stunt"?
May 6, 2025 at 1:47 PM
@ericlipton.nytimes.com amplifying this. Why is it a stunt? Is it because it doesn't have a hope of going anywhere in the GOP-controlled House? Calling it a stunt implies it's a waste of time. Is that what you meant?
Movie you've watched more than six times using GIFs
April 26, 2025 at 5:08 AM
Movie you've watched more than six times using GIFs
I am advocating for due process for Kilmar Abrego Garcia.
JUST IN: Deputy Assistant to the President and "Counterterrorism Czar" Sebastian Gorka says anyone advocating for due process for Kilmar Abrego Garcia could be viewed as "aiding and abetting a terrorist" and be federally charged. (h/t Philip Germain)
April 17, 2025 at 4:00 PM
I am advocating for due process for Kilmar Abrego Garcia.
Reposted by nelsonsteelberg.bsky.social
For DOD employees who have or will likely soon receive a directive to remove personal pronouns from an email signature, 10 USC Sec. 986 prohibits the Secretary of Defense from either requiring OR FORBIDDING the use of personal pronouns in an official email signature
uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?r...
uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?r...
uscode.house.gov
February 1, 2025 at 7:52 PM
For DOD employees who have or will likely soon receive a directive to remove personal pronouns from an email signature, 10 USC Sec. 986 prohibits the Secretary of Defense from either requiring OR FORBIDDING the use of personal pronouns in an official email signature
uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?r...
uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?r...