Too late for me to start figuring that out though, wasted enough time on flipping the redirect shit back and forth

I just want to state for the record that I am not against the Freemasons, this isn't an anti-Freemason game, and I am stating this for a reason other than that I am afraid of the Masons. Thank you.

I didn't originally have them in there, it's not a game about Freemasons, but I wanted to put a couple political problems in there and I was like what if the game's Crisis Era was just Propaganda Due/Years of Lead so that's what I did.

I'm also not going to show the game manual to anybody who doesn't join the game, or until a few months after the game flops. It's too much info if you're not that interested in playing.

Even if I disagree, if what I wanted to do was have a conversation, I come at them like I want to have a conversation. I don't understand why people find this difficult. I mean, I think they're just being obtuse, but don't act as though I can't see what's going on.

Sydney ANNA-HELENA Sweeney the 14th?????

I didn't have enough characters but you get it

I'm getting tired of whatever it is you think you're doing, so I will say this. The fact that you didn't think "why did you say that?" was a good way to start the conversation, and instead "actually I think everything you said was wrong, I expect you to respond civilly", you have disordered thinking

I'm not a "hit dog will holler" guy because I did clearly criticize atheists, but my whole point is that you can be an atheist without being like that. You think you're being fact-based or whatever but you aren't. You can stop doing this.

"Don't say anything bad about atheism, I THINK ALL 230 MILLION CHRISTIANS SUPPORT CAPITALIST PROTESTANT WORK ETHIC INCLUDING THE CATHOLICS". Every time I say atheists who think like this are bad, an atheist who thinks like this comes out and tries to prove they aren't like that, but you always are

You think it's okay to claim without evidence that the average religious person is an active defender of capitalism, but if I ask you to demonstrate why atheism is better, that's out of line? Stating those criteria is not "all you did".

So you came into the conversation saying how actually I'm just wrong, and now you want me to believe that you came here looking for a pleasant back-and-forth.

If you thought what you did was starting off on the best foot, I don't really know why you're mad at me.

What do you think the average atheist person is doing

And if your position is "well it's dumb so I don't have to understand it", like....................... come on. You're not gonna criticize religion and then sell me on "condemning something without really knowing about it" being a good idea

If your position is that religion is just a trick, that religion is just a method of control, that religion is just a method to assuage yourself about dying, that religion is just a way to impose morality, or that religion is reducible to any collection of those, then you just won't understand it.