Nancy Chadwick
@nancychadwick.bsky.social
Independent. Former pioneer litigation paralegal, author, teacher & practitioner in land brokerage and development. Creative in various media. Fan of primary-sourced info, Manfred-less baseball, Civil War.
selected NYT journos pandering in 11/23/16 interview w/Trump -- see www.nytimes.com/2016/11/23/u...
I remember seeing the NYT promoting Maggie Haberman, as its seeming 'fair haired reporter' in Trump 1.0 but *not* disclosing that her mother worked for Kushner or that MH was buds w/Roger Stone.
I remember seeing the NYT promoting Maggie Haberman, as its seeming 'fair haired reporter' in Trump 1.0 but *not* disclosing that her mother worked for Kushner or that MH was buds w/Roger Stone.
July 8, 2025 at 3:46 PM
selected NYT journos pandering in 11/23/16 interview w/Trump -- see www.nytimes.com/2016/11/23/u...
I remember seeing the NYT promoting Maggie Haberman, as its seeming 'fair haired reporter' in Trump 1.0 but *not* disclosing that her mother worked for Kushner or that MH was buds w/Roger Stone.
I remember seeing the NYT promoting Maggie Haberman, as its seeming 'fair haired reporter' in Trump 1.0 but *not* disclosing that her mother worked for Kushner or that MH was buds w/Roger Stone.
Protests? On January 6?
Was "Insurrectionists" too long for your headline?
Was "Insurrectionists" too long for your headline?
July 2, 2025 at 12:12 AM
Protests? On January 6?
Was "Insurrectionists" too long for your headline?
Was "Insurrectionists" too long for your headline?
He was all for opposing certification of the election results. But later that day, when the Insurrectionists attacked the Capitol on Jan 6, he was haulin' ass . . . wearing his red, white and blue outfit.
June 29, 2025 at 4:34 PM
He was all for opposing certification of the election results. But later that day, when the Insurrectionists attacked the Capitol on Jan 6, he was haulin' ass . . . wearing his red, white and blue outfit.
"I have faced verbal attacks and harassment...due to my association with the events of January 6."
You mean 'events' like this, right?
You mean 'events' like this, right?
June 24, 2025 at 1:39 AM
"I have faced verbal attacks and harassment...due to my association with the events of January 6."
You mean 'events' like this, right?
You mean 'events' like this, right?
Here's the second page:
June 21, 2025 at 1:06 AM
Here's the second page:
Here's the first page:
June 21, 2025 at 1:06 AM
Here's the first page:
It will take Dem senators voting him out of leadership.
June 18, 2025 at 10:22 PM
It will take Dem senators voting him out of leadership.
Suggest flying 1 pair of these from each flag pole.
June 18, 2025 at 9:16 PM
Suggest flying 1 pair of these from each flag pole.
Appeal to heaven
June 18, 2025 at 12:53 PM
Appeal to heaven
"On behalf of a grateful Congress..."
The law enacted in 2022 *required* the plaque to be installed by March, 2023. Nobody has the right to defy this law.
Permission? NONE necessary. Cowardice? BOTH sides of the aisle.
The law enacted in 2022 *required* the plaque to be installed by March, 2023. Nobody has the right to defy this law.
Permission? NONE necessary. Cowardice? BOTH sides of the aisle.
June 17, 2025 at 2:31 AM
"On behalf of a grateful Congress..."
The law enacted in 2022 *required* the plaque to be installed by March, 2023. Nobody has the right to defy this law.
Permission? NONE necessary. Cowardice? BOTH sides of the aisle.
The law enacted in 2022 *required* the plaque to be installed by March, 2023. Nobody has the right to defy this law.
Permission? NONE necessary. Cowardice? BOTH sides of the aisle.
"... and secure the Blessings of Liberty
to ourselves and our Posterity...."
to ourselves and our Posterity...."
June 15, 2025 at 4:13 AM
"... and secure the Blessings of Liberty
to ourselves and our Posterity...."
to ourselves and our Posterity...."
Insurrectionists carrying foreign flags attacking law enforcement officers
June 9, 2025 at 1:47 AM
Insurrectionists carrying foreign flags attacking law enforcement officers
@hakeem-jeffries.bsky.social @aguilar.house.gov @reptedlieu.bsky.social @joeneguse.bsky.social @whipkclark.bsky.social
This is *real* pushing back. The law required the Jan 6 plaque be hung 2 yrs ago. You waited for GOP coop instead of hanging the plaque yourselves.
This is *real* pushing back. The law required the Jan 6 plaque be hung 2 yrs ago. You waited for GOP coop instead of hanging the plaque yourselves.
May 18, 2025 at 4:23 PM
@hakeem-jeffries.bsky.social @aguilar.house.gov @reptedlieu.bsky.social @joeneguse.bsky.social @whipkclark.bsky.social
This is *real* pushing back. The law required the Jan 6 plaque be hung 2 yrs ago. You waited for GOP coop instead of hanging the plaque yourselves.
This is *real* pushing back. The law required the Jan 6 plaque be hung 2 yrs ago. You waited for GOP coop instead of hanging the plaque yourselves.
Whenever I want to rant about AI, I console myself with this:
If you asked the average Philly guy if they liked "AI", they'd probably think you were talking about Allen Iverson.
If you asked the average Philly guy if they liked "AI", they'd probably think you were talking about Allen Iverson.
May 14, 2025 at 11:01 PM
Whenever I want to rant about AI, I console myself with this:
If you asked the average Philly guy if they liked "AI", they'd probably think you were talking about Allen Iverson.
If you asked the average Philly guy if they liked "AI", they'd probably think you were talking about Allen Iverson.
2) Cover memo by then Sen. Gregg (GOP) dated December 1, 2009 for the two-page list of "tools" the minority party were allowed to use by Senate Rules to oppose measures sought by the majority party.
April 30, 2025 at 7:55 PM
2) Cover memo by then Sen. Gregg (GOP) dated December 1, 2009 for the two-page list of "tools" the minority party were allowed to use by Senate Rules to oppose measures sought by the majority party.
3) Page 1 of Senate Rule-adherent "Minority Party's Rights in the Senate (Fall 2009)"
April 30, 2025 at 7:48 PM
3) Page 1 of Senate Rule-adherent "Minority Party's Rights in the Senate (Fall 2009)"
4) Page 2 of Senate Rule-adherent "Minority Party's Rights in the Senate (Fall 2009)"
April 30, 2025 at 7:44 PM
4) Page 2 of Senate Rule-adherent "Minority Party's Rights in the Senate (Fall 2009)"
Wise decision by GA State University!
April 30, 2025 at 2:50 PM
Wise decision by GA State University!
Jalen Hurts is #1 on and off the field.
April 28, 2025 at 9:28 PM
Jalen Hurts is #1 on and off the field.
The House members cite four federal criminal statutes: anti-bribery of public officials, aiding/abetting extortion, defrauding the public, and racketeering.
18 U.S.C. §§ 201(b)(1), 1951, 1341, 1346, 1349, 1962.
18 U.S.C. §§ 201(b)(1), 1951, 1341, 1346, 1349, 1962.
April 25, 2025 at 2:00 AM
The House members cite four federal criminal statutes: anti-bribery of public officials, aiding/abetting extortion, defrauding the public, and racketeering.
18 U.S.C. §§ 201(b)(1), 1951, 1341, 1346, 1349, 1962.
18 U.S.C. §§ 201(b)(1), 1951, 1341, 1346, 1349, 1962.
In the letters sent to the 9 firms, House members warned that the settlements could expose the firms to possible violations of federal & state criminal laws, including RICO and The Hobbs Act, as well as ethics violations of Rules of Professional Conduct.
April 25, 2025 at 1:33 AM
In the letters sent to the 9 firms, House members warned that the settlements could expose the firms to possible violations of federal & state criminal laws, including RICO and The Hobbs Act, as well as ethics violations of Rules of Professional Conduct.
A favorite Declarant subbing as Defendants' daily Status Report required by Judge Xinis in Abrego Garcia case.
April 17, 2025 at 11:39 PM
A favorite Declarant subbing as Defendants' daily Status Report required by Judge Xinis in Abrego Garcia case.
Docket entries (DE) list chronologically (old to new) filings in a case by e.g., parties, counsel, judge. Excerpt here shows some of the activity that took place on March 25: Motion for TRO+Attachments; J's Orders; notation of phone Conference before Judge Xinis. DE = snapshot of activity in a case
April 14, 2025 at 12:19 PM
Docket entries (DE) list chronologically (old to new) filings in a case by e.g., parties, counsel, judge. Excerpt here shows some of the activity that took place on March 25: Motion for TRO+Attachments; J's Orders; notation of phone Conference before Judge Xinis. DE = snapshot of activity in a case
Here's the link to the docket entries for the Garcia case before Judge Xinis. To read the documents for, say, "63 Apr 12, 2025", right-click the blue link "Main Document" (new window opens). Bookmark the link to check for updates.
www.courtlistener.com/docket/69777...
www.courtlistener.com/docket/69777...
April 14, 2025 at 11:38 AM
Here's the link to the docket entries for the Garcia case before Judge Xinis. To read the documents for, say, "63 Apr 12, 2025", right-click the blue link "Main Document" (new window opens). Bookmark the link to check for updates.
www.courtlistener.com/docket/69777...
www.courtlistener.com/docket/69777...
@joshuajfriedman.com This was a pix I had saved earlier today as a jpg. Do I understand correctly that you can only add ALT text to a "free standing" pix (i.e., not a pix that was contained in a document)?
April 13, 2025 at 7:39 PM
@joshuajfriedman.com This was a pix I had saved earlier today as a jpg. Do I understand correctly that you can only add ALT text to a "free standing" pix (i.e., not a pix that was contained in a document)?