Like, aesthetically, this looks great. They nailed it.
November 14, 2025 at 2:21 PM
Like, aesthetically, this looks great. They nailed it.
I got a couple of paragraphs in… this isn’t true. He didn’t win men under 30 by that much.
November 10, 2025 at 5:26 PM
I got a couple of paragraphs in… this isn’t true. He didn’t win men under 30 by that much.
The people who call Democrats “controlled opposition”, the Republicans talking about the “uniparty” and the people who post this dumb ratchet graphic have never been more vindicated:
November 10, 2025 at 11:50 AM
The people who call Democrats “controlled opposition”, the Republicans talking about the “uniparty” and the people who post this dumb ratchet graphic have never been more vindicated:
It is amazing that:
1. The rich people of the world have coalesced around the idea that it does not matter what Party a candidate is from, he’s good as long as he is corrupt & willing to fuck over the poor/middle class
2. They express this opinion freely & everyone doesn’t say “hey, fuck that guy”
1. The rich people of the world have coalesced around the idea that it does not matter what Party a candidate is from, he’s good as long as he is corrupt & willing to fuck over the poor/middle class
2. They express this opinion freely & everyone doesn’t say “hey, fuck that guy”
November 3, 2025 at 9:10 PM
It is amazing that:
1. The rich people of the world have coalesced around the idea that it does not matter what Party a candidate is from, he’s good as long as he is corrupt & willing to fuck over the poor/middle class
2. They express this opinion freely & everyone doesn’t say “hey, fuck that guy”
1. The rich people of the world have coalesced around the idea that it does not matter what Party a candidate is from, he’s good as long as he is corrupt & willing to fuck over the poor/middle class
2. They express this opinion freely & everyone doesn’t say “hey, fuck that guy”
What about this top one here?
Are you willing to abandon everything you believe in to appease some mythical swing voters that you’ve invented in your mind? Or should only other people do that?
Are you willing to abandon everything you believe in to appease some mythical swing voters that you’ve invented in your mind? Or should only other people do that?
October 29, 2025 at 8:56 PM
What about this top one here?
Are you willing to abandon everything you believe in to appease some mythical swing voters that you’ve invented in your mind? Or should only other people do that?
Are you willing to abandon everything you believe in to appease some mythical swing voters that you’ve invented in your mind? Or should only other people do that?
Whenever *a* player attacks?!?!!
October 28, 2025 at 6:31 PM
Whenever *a* player attacks?!?!!
This part was spot on. Why else would you post a list of things that no Democrat was campaigning on and try to sell it as the Dems’ shortcomings:
October 28, 2025 at 5:22 PM
This part was spot on. Why else would you post a list of things that no Democrat was campaigning on and try to sell it as the Dems’ shortcomings:
Yes, it’s easy to call for moderation as long as you dismiss all the examples of moderate candidates who got their asses kicked (because they were too “boring”).
Also, not fused the methodology here is very sound. If you took money from group X, then you are not moderate?
Also, not fused the methodology here is very sound. If you took money from group X, then you are not moderate?
October 20, 2025 at 12:33 PM
Yes, it’s easy to call for moderation as long as you dismiss all the examples of moderate candidates who got their asses kicked (because they were too “boring”).
Also, not fused the methodology here is very sound. If you took money from group X, then you are not moderate?
Also, not fused the methodology here is very sound. If you took money from group X, then you are not moderate?
I just looked (because I was interested in the ski instructor thing) and you aren’t missing much:
October 17, 2025 at 1:19 PM
I just looked (because I was interested in the ski instructor thing) and you aren’t missing much:
Credit to you for admitting that your argument sucks in the middle of your argument!
October 14, 2025 at 10:29 AM
Credit to you for admitting that your argument sucks in the middle of your argument!
That’s not what this says and you know it.
(Also, one could argue that, with the amount of Republicans Senators & the 2/3 rule, they never had the votes to convict)
(Also, one could argue that, with the amount of Republicans Senators & the 2/3 rule, they never had the votes to convict)
August 26, 2025 at 4:06 PM
That’s not what this says and you know it.
(Also, one could argue that, with the amount of Republicans Senators & the 2/3 rule, they never had the votes to convict)
(Also, one could argue that, with the amount of Republicans Senators & the 2/3 rule, they never had the votes to convict)
Certainly different than this coverage:
July 9, 2025 at 2:31 PM
Certainly different than this coverage:
This kind of speculation is always overblown. In the 2010s, several articles were written about how NY was going to lose so many seats after 2020.
They ended up losing one seat because they came up 89 people short.
They ended up losing one seat because they came up 89 people short.
May 13, 2025 at 6:43 PM
This kind of speculation is always overblown. In the 2010s, several articles were written about how NY was going to lose so many seats after 2020.
They ended up losing one seat because they came up 89 people short.
They ended up losing one seat because they came up 89 people short.
Feels like you left out some context from that article you linked… enough that I’d say that your claim is probably false.
April 24, 2025 at 9:04 PM
Feels like you left out some context from that article you linked… enough that I’d say that your claim is probably false.
Comey & people like Kinzinger, who tried to make a big deal about something that was completely nothing.
March 25, 2025 at 2:03 AM
Comey & people like Kinzinger, who tried to make a big deal about something that was completely nothing.
Yes, I remember you pretended to give a shit about it (along with the entire mainstream media):
March 25, 2025 at 2:00 AM
Yes, I remember you pretended to give a shit about it (along with the entire mainstream media):
I read it, you didn’t. It includes shit like this (a nice graph to show you that Democrats always go into the doldrums among independents after a Republican is elected, but the bounce back after Republicans prove that they suck ass at governing)
March 20, 2025 at 7:31 PM
I read it, you didn’t. It includes shit like this (a nice graph to show you that Democrats always go into the doldrums among independents after a Republican is elected, but the bounce back after Republicans prove that they suck ass at governing)
Yes, but if you didn’t selectively edit your Gallup poll, you’d see this (and maybe you might make some inferences that Dems do better when Republicans are in power & Republicans do better when Dems are in power)
March 20, 2025 at 7:27 PM
Yes, but if you didn’t selectively edit your Gallup poll, you’d see this (and maybe you might make some inferences that Dems do better when Republicans are in power & Republicans do better when Dems are in power)
Also, that “terrible” Biden jobs number (that was still way more than Trump’s number), was revised substantially upward when the next month’s report came out. Were you tut tutting people then?
March 8, 2025 at 1:59 PM
Also, that “terrible” Biden jobs number (that was still way more than Trump’s number), was revised substantially upward when the next month’s report came out. Were you tut tutting people then?
The expectations were for higher jobs this month, so reporting it as a disappointment would be fine
March 8, 2025 at 1:58 PM
The expectations were for higher jobs this month, so reporting it as a disappointment would be fine