@madtown3.bsky.social
John Fetterman: This Drug Changed My Life. More Americans Need Access. www.nytimes.com/2025/04/08/o...
Opinion | John Fetterman: GLP-1 Drugs Saved My Health. More Americans Need Access.
The government should make it easier to access GLP-1s.
www.nytimes.com
April 9, 2025 at 8:49 AM
John Fetterman: This Drug Changed My Life. More Americans Need Access. www.nytimes.com/2025/04/08/o...
A sign of the times. This flyer was pinned outside my apartment today calling for residents to get organized in the face of government cutbacks. I live in a HUD-subsidized building in a nice and convenient Madison neighborhood. I've wondered when federal cuts would affect us personally. Stay tuned.
April 6, 2025 at 6:26 AM
A sign of the times. This flyer was pinned outside my apartment today calling for residents to get organized in the face of government cutbacks. I live in a HUD-subsidized building in a nice and convenient Madison neighborhood. I've wondered when federal cuts would affect us personally. Stay tuned.
Reposted
I guess my favorite would be: Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
SOME WOKE PHRASES I KINDA LIKE.
"Feed the poor"
"House the homeless"
"Respect one another"
"Honest day's pay for an honest day's work"
"We deserve the right to be ourselves"
"It should be illegal for oligarchs to buy elections
"Don't be evil"
"Oppose fascism"
"Billionaires should pay tax."
"Feed the poor"
"House the homeless"
"Respect one another"
"Honest day's pay for an honest day's work"
"We deserve the right to be ourselves"
"It should be illegal for oligarchs to buy elections
"Don't be evil"
"Oppose fascism"
"Billionaires should pay tax."
March 23, 2025 at 4:33 AM
I guess my favorite would be: Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.
Reposted
Secretary Lutnick: You are a billionaire.
Maybe your mother-in-law wouldn't complain if she didn't get her Social Security check, but tens of millions of seniors struggling to survive would.
They're not fraudsters. They earned it.
How out of touch are you not to realize that?
Maybe your mother-in-law wouldn't complain if she didn't get her Social Security check, but tens of millions of seniors struggling to survive would.
They're not fraudsters. They earned it.
How out of touch are you not to realize that?
BREAKING: Trump's billionaire Commerce Secretary says that seniors won't care if they don't get their Social Security checks — and that anyone who does complain is a fraudster.
March 21, 2025 at 10:06 PM
Secretary Lutnick: You are a billionaire.
Maybe your mother-in-law wouldn't complain if she didn't get her Social Security check, but tens of millions of seniors struggling to survive would.
They're not fraudsters. They earned it.
How out of touch are you not to realize that?
Maybe your mother-in-law wouldn't complain if she didn't get her Social Security check, but tens of millions of seniors struggling to survive would.
They're not fraudsters. They earned it.
How out of touch are you not to realize that?
Explore this gift article from The New York Times. You can read it for free without a subscription. www.nytimes.com/interactive/...
I don't fully agree that "it's all over" because there still are high-paying markets, but you must also weed through places that pay little or even nothing.
I don't fully agree that "it's all over" because there still are high-paying markets, but you must also weed through places that pay little or even nothing.
The Gen X Career Meltdown (Gift Article)
Just when they should be at their peak, experienced workers in creative fields find that their skills are all but obsolete.
www.nytimes.com
April 3, 2025 at 4:28 AM
Explore this gift article from The New York Times. You can read it for free without a subscription. www.nytimes.com/interactive/...
I don't fully agree that "it's all over" because there still are high-paying markets, but you must also weed through places that pay little or even nothing.
I don't fully agree that "it's all over" because there still are high-paying markets, but you must also weed through places that pay little or even nothing.
Better headline: First they came for the child pornographers, then the pedophiles. Where will the madness end?
Calling the rape of a child free speech that requires privacy protection is so bizarre, such a twisted interpretation of our vital rights. Way to go, ACLU! Bury your heads in the sand.
Calling the rape of a child free speech that requires privacy protection is so bizarre, such a twisted interpretation of our vital rights. Way to go, ACLU! Bury your heads in the sand.
ACLU, Allies Warn Internet Bills 'Would Undermine Free Speech, Privacy, and Security' | Common Dreams
While these bills' supporters aim to hold tech giants accountable for not protecting vulnerable communities, one expert warned, "increasing censorship and weakening encryption would not only be ineffe...
www.commondreams.org
March 23, 2025 at 3:21 AM
Better headline: First they came for the child pornographers, then the pedophiles. Where will the madness end?
Calling the rape of a child free speech that requires privacy protection is so bizarre, such a twisted interpretation of our vital rights. Way to go, ACLU! Bury your heads in the sand.
Calling the rape of a child free speech that requires privacy protection is so bizarre, such a twisted interpretation of our vital rights. Way to go, ACLU! Bury your heads in the sand.