Nathan Lombardi
@lom.bsky.social
3D modeler/sculptor ⬩ illustrator ⬩ concept artist ⬩ pixel pusher ⬩ game artist
Decent maker of art. Terrible at social media.
Decent maker of art. Terrible at social media.
Political theater. That’s why so many republicans voted yes. This was always the plan once an investigation was opened.
November 18, 2025 at 9:19 PM
Political theater. That’s why so many republicans voted yes. This was always the plan once an investigation was opened.
Minton also mentioned a rumor I heard at the time that Toby Danger played a minor roll in 90's JQ to "rethink" their series.
November 18, 2025 at 8:59 PM
Minton also mentioned a rumor I heard at the time that Toby Danger played a minor roll in 90's JQ to "rethink" their series.
They're absolutely doing that.
I found this interview with Tom Minton about Toby Danger. I knew it had the three main voice actors from the 80's JQ but I didn't know that they had done a pitch to make it a weekly series. Toby Danger would of been Venture Bros. before Venture Bros.
I found this interview with Tom Minton about Toby Danger. I knew it had the three main voice actors from the 80's JQ but I didn't know that they had done a pitch to make it a weekly series. Toby Danger would of been Venture Bros. before Venture Bros.
Toby Danger (OBSCURE Freakazoid! Episode) (PART 2) | Looney Tunes Review
YouTube video by The Looney Tunes Critic
www.youtube.com
November 18, 2025 at 8:58 PM
They're absolutely doing that.
I found this interview with Tom Minton about Toby Danger. I knew it had the three main voice actors from the 80's JQ but I didn't know that they had done a pitch to make it a weekly series. Toby Danger would of been Venture Bros. before Venture Bros.
I found this interview with Tom Minton about Toby Danger. I knew it had the three main voice actors from the 80's JQ but I didn't know that they had done a pitch to make it a weekly series. Toby Danger would of been Venture Bros. before Venture Bros.
These companies are trying to get in while the grift is hot and money is flowing don't think that they'll get sucked down when it all implodes.
Because that strategy has never bit anyone in the ass before.
Because that strategy has never bit anyone in the ass before.
November 18, 2025 at 8:42 PM
These companies are trying to get in while the grift is hot and money is flowing don't think that they'll get sucked down when it all implodes.
Because that strategy has never bit anyone in the ass before.
Because that strategy has never bit anyone in the ass before.
He's right. We need to find a middle ground on piracy.
If you don't want to pay people for work and would rather use a generative slop machine to steal their livelihood then consumers shouldn't have to pay anything for media that uses AI.
If you don't want to pay people for work and would rather use a generative slop machine to steal their livelihood then consumers shouldn't have to pay anything for media that uses AI.
November 17, 2025 at 4:37 PM
He's right. We need to find a middle ground on piracy.
If you don't want to pay people for work and would rather use a generative slop machine to steal their livelihood then consumers shouldn't have to pay anything for media that uses AI.
If you don't want to pay people for work and would rather use a generative slop machine to steal their livelihood then consumers shouldn't have to pay anything for media that uses AI.
He's right. We need to find a middle ground on piracy.
If you don't want to pay people for work and rather use a generative slop machine to steal their livelihood then consumers shouldn't have to pay anything for media that uses AI.
If you don't want to pay people for work and rather use a generative slop machine to steal their livelihood then consumers shouldn't have to pay anything for media that uses AI.
November 17, 2025 at 4:32 PM
He's right. We need to find a middle ground on piracy.
If you don't want to pay people for work and rather use a generative slop machine to steal their livelihood then consumers shouldn't have to pay anything for media that uses AI.
If you don't want to pay people for work and rather use a generative slop machine to steal their livelihood then consumers shouldn't have to pay anything for media that uses AI.
It's hard to sum up what your work has meant to me and am sad to see to it end this way. Life is too short. You contributed to making the world a better place. Thank you.
November 17, 2025 at 4:39 AM
It's hard to sum up what your work has meant to me and am sad to see to it end this way. Life is too short. You contributed to making the world a better place. Thank you.
Reminds me of Tom Minton's Jonny Quest parody "Toby Danger" seen on Freakazoid!
November 17, 2025 at 12:27 AM
Reminds me of Tom Minton's Jonny Quest parody "Toby Danger" seen on Freakazoid!
The games we have to play to get the best rental prices on our software.
I can find many workarounds for Photoshop and Illustrator. But things like After Effects and Substance don't have comparable alternatives. Yet.
I can find many workarounds for Photoshop and Illustrator. But things like After Effects and Substance don't have comparable alternatives. Yet.
November 16, 2025 at 11:32 PM
The games we have to play to get the best rental prices on our software.
I can find many workarounds for Photoshop and Illustrator. But things like After Effects and Substance don't have comparable alternatives. Yet.
I can find many workarounds for Photoshop and Illustrator. But things like After Effects and Substance don't have comparable alternatives. Yet.