Not for all worse off for alot labour are harming so much

You've previously incorrectly stated that 9 in 10 claimants wouldn't be affected when in fact 9 in 10 WOULD be affected.

Our region has already been ravaged by Tory cuts, please don't let Labour do the same. Please @lewisatkinson.bsky.social oppose the disability benefits cuts

If the cuts go ahead @lewisatkinson.bsky.social, each disabled person in your constituency would lose £297 per month. Thats the 28th most impacted out of all 543 constituencies in the UK. 2/

Labour’s so-called ‘free breakfast clubs’ are a cover-up for the ‘Children, Schools and Well-being Bill’—stripping parents’ rights and eroding family time. This isn’t about care, it’s control. #ParentingRights #StopTheBill"

The running total of hardship/poverty created by Labour looks like 10k children, 2.5m pensioners, 1.3m disabled people. Targeted austerity.

The bill if implemented is likely to lead to even more tragedies with children being forced into a school environment that is traumatic for them leading to long term mental health issues or worse.

Again you’re focusing on the wrong issue.

Yet STILL they were not protected The teams around them let them down
The law is already sufficient to safeguard children whether they are educated at school or otherwiseBut it relies on people to take action

The children in the serious case reviews were on a list - on several caseloads , with allocated numbers , KNOWN to be at risk , some from before birth. While they were at school and long before they were home educated.

this bill is dangerous to parental rights and all children.
The bill won’t stop “vulnerable children falling through the cracks.
A “number” for every child and a listof children who are home educated won”t stop vulnerable children being let down by an ill funded, understaffed social care system.

Where the real proof only seen appointment cancelled

But harm the disabled and cause suicides and deaths and harm children