Lisa Fajita 🧱 😡
@lisafajita.bsky.social
She/Her. I should put something here but i'm no good at these things.
Age yourself with gaming!
November 13, 2025 at 9:09 AM
Age yourself with gaming!
And this idiot needs to realise we see what she has done and is doing and there is no indication she intends to reject the guidance or has ever indicated a need for fixing the legislation to protect trans people.
If he votes for her then he should lose our support, published guidance or not.
If he votes for her then he should lose our support, published guidance or not.
October 14, 2025 at 6:34 AM
And this idiot needs to realise we see what she has done and is doing and there is no indication she intends to reject the guidance or has ever indicated a need for fixing the legislation to protect trans people.
If he votes for her then he should lose our support, published guidance or not.
If he votes for her then he should lose our support, published guidance or not.
Nope. The @libdems.org.uk are welcoming the guidance
October 13, 2025 at 11:21 PM
Nope. The @libdems.org.uk are welcoming the guidance
Apparently they can't even tell they are having sex with a trans woman when they are being penetrated by one.
We've been so successful with women can have a penis that stupid men now think they are getting fucked in the ass by a cis woman with a dick.
We've been so successful with women can have a penis that stupid men now think they are getting fucked in the ass by a cis woman with a dick.
August 23, 2025 at 10:30 AM
Apparently they can't even tell they are having sex with a trans woman when they are being penetrated by one.
We've been so successful with women can have a penis that stupid men now think they are getting fucked in the ass by a cis woman with a dick.
We've been so successful with women can have a penis that stupid men now think they are getting fucked in the ass by a cis woman with a dick.
It's also inconsistent because she was found guilty of assault by penetration
Unless there was force involved which there seems to be no mention of, then vanilla cishet sex was off the table long before his regrets set in
What did he think she was using for penetration, her really really big clit.
Unless there was force involved which there seems to be no mention of, then vanilla cishet sex was off the table long before his regrets set in
What did he think she was using for penetration, her really really big clit.
August 23, 2025 at 9:00 AM
It's also inconsistent because she was found guilty of assault by penetration
Unless there was force involved which there seems to be no mention of, then vanilla cishet sex was off the table long before his regrets set in
What did he think she was using for penetration, her really really big clit.
Unless there was force involved which there seems to be no mention of, then vanilla cishet sex was off the table long before his regrets set in
What did he think she was using for penetration, her really really big clit.
My god they quite literally have the toilet police, and when they are not there it's locked with pin code access.
Presumably your pin code is immutable and determined at conception based on your egg production potential, faulty, poultry or otherwise.
Presumably your pin code is immutable and determined at conception based on your egg production potential, faulty, poultry or otherwise.
August 20, 2025 at 4:44 AM
My god they quite literally have the toilet police, and when they are not there it's locked with pin code access.
Presumably your pin code is immutable and determined at conception based on your egg production potential, faulty, poultry or otherwise.
Presumably your pin code is immutable and determined at conception based on your egg production potential, faulty, poultry or otherwise.
Thought they just painted it gold, nothing as extravagant as real gold plating for shazza. A golden shazza would just wash it off.
It's in the paper of record so it must be true, fully researched and true.
Lady golden shazza of warm puddle
It's in the paper of record so it must be true, fully researched and true.
Lady golden shazza of warm puddle
August 17, 2025 at 6:06 AM
Thought they just painted it gold, nothing as extravagant as real gold plating for shazza. A golden shazza would just wash it off.
It's in the paper of record so it must be true, fully researched and true.
Lady golden shazza of warm puddle
It's in the paper of record so it must be true, fully researched and true.
Lady golden shazza of warm puddle
Hold on there's something fishy about this chart. The 3 younger groups there was overwhelming support for trans women but in the older 3, two of them were pretty even yet the overall figure matches these. It suggests an age bias in the polling with more participants recruited in the opposed groups
August 7, 2025 at 5:40 AM
Hold on there's something fishy about this chart. The 3 younger groups there was overwhelming support for trans women but in the older 3, two of them were pretty even yet the overall figure matches these. It suggests an age bias in the polling with more participants recruited in the opposed groups
Oh god not even one like. Even their own side don't like them!
July 31, 2025 at 6:59 AM
Oh god not even one like. Even their own side don't like them!
ah your not even trying if its not disk film
July 25, 2025 at 7:14 AM
ah your not even trying if its not disk film
Falkner herself claimed in the W&ESC review to personally represent 8 of the 9 protected characteristics.
I can't figure if she transitioned or is having a miracle geriatric pregnancy.
I can't figure if she transitioned or is having a miracle geriatric pregnancy.
July 2, 2025 at 6:34 AM
Falkner herself claimed in the W&ESC review to personally represent 8 of the 9 protected characteristics.
I can't figure if she transitioned or is having a miracle geriatric pregnancy.
I can't figure if she transitioned or is having a miracle geriatric pregnancy.
New email just landed in my MPs inbox complete with PDF attachment for easy (uneasy) reading.
Content in alt text
FFS shouldn't have to be emailing my MP before 7.30Am and coffee, but the absolute state of this country! Got the EHRC pre appointment scrutiny meeting later as well.
Content in alt text
FFS shouldn't have to be emailing my MP before 7.30Am and coffee, but the absolute state of this country! Got the EHRC pre appointment scrutiny meeting later as well.
July 1, 2025 at 6:25 AM
New email just landed in my MPs inbox complete with PDF attachment for easy (uneasy) reading.
Content in alt text
FFS shouldn't have to be emailing my MP before 7.30Am and coffee, but the absolute state of this country! Got the EHRC pre appointment scrutiny meeting later as well.
Content in alt text
FFS shouldn't have to be emailing my MP before 7.30Am and coffee, but the absolute state of this country! Got the EHRC pre appointment scrutiny meeting later as well.
Oh, they are not going to like my consultation responses then.
June 27, 2025 at 8:00 PM
Oh, they are not going to like my consultation responses then.
The Libdems are going to roll over and just accept and implement whatever guidance the GC activist led EHRC comes up with.
My Libdem MP even went as far as saying it's always been possible to exclude trans people as if that makes the EHRC guidance ok
My Libdem MP even went as far as saying it's always been possible to exclude trans people as if that makes the EHRC guidance ok
June 25, 2025 at 6:20 AM
The Libdems are going to roll over and just accept and implement whatever guidance the GC activist led EHRC comes up with.
My Libdem MP even went as far as saying it's always been possible to exclude trans people as if that makes the EHRC guidance ok
My Libdem MP even went as far as saying it's always been possible to exclude trans people as if that makes the EHRC guidance ok
except the supreme court didn't say that, they just kicked the can down the road saying the definition of biological is the ordinary meaning and obvious whilst forgetting they just issued a judgement on the definition of sex which was apparently equally obvious and them doing so causing chaos.
June 24, 2025 at 8:05 AM
except the supreme court didn't say that, they just kicked the can down the road saying the definition of biological is the ordinary meaning and obvious whilst forgetting they just issued a judgement on the definition of sex which was apparently equally obvious and them doing so causing chaos.
Can I be the first to congratulate Kishwer Falkner on the expectation of her next child. A truly amazing pregnancy at the age 70
Because she surely isn't claiming to have the protected characteristic of gender reassignment as pretty sure she is cis and certainly isn't associated with trans people
Because she surely isn't claiming to have the protected characteristic of gender reassignment as pretty sure she is cis and certainly isn't associated with trans people
June 12, 2025 at 9:29 PM
Can I be the first to congratulate Kishwer Falkner on the expectation of her next child. A truly amazing pregnancy at the age 70
Because she surely isn't claiming to have the protected characteristic of gender reassignment as pretty sure she is cis and certainly isn't associated with trans people
Because she surely isn't claiming to have the protected characteristic of gender reassignment as pretty sure she is cis and certainly isn't associated with trans people
Could they have given a clearer description of conversion therapy if they had tried?
June 10, 2025 at 6:59 AM
Could they have given a clearer description of conversion therapy if they had tried?
If only LGBT Labour members would have as much integrity as the FCA LGBTQ+ staff network and rather than whine about being banned for representing a party harming the community, boycott their party flag and refuse to represent Labour at Pride.
www.thepinknews.com/2025/06/02/f...
www.thepinknews.com/2025/06/02/f...
![The Financial Conduct Authority’s (FCA) LGBTQ+ staff network is refusing to march under the organisation’s banner at Pride after being told the regulator would be designating office single-sex facilities, such as toilets, as based on “biological sex”.
In an email seen by PinkNews, members of InsideOut said that in the wake of discussions with senior leaders, the steering group “cannot, in good conscious, organise and support the [financial regulator’s] attendance at any Pride celebrations this year”.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:co5f3fdjzs3khbmhjhgmzjxl/bafkreiayas3mg45uhhqo4qkqjkxlomgny7ix7mlstmls2kb7m64ddicmg4@jpeg)
June 4, 2025 at 2:31 PM
If only LGBT Labour members would have as much integrity as the FCA LGBTQ+ staff network and rather than whine about being banned for representing a party harming the community, boycott their party flag and refuse to represent Labour at Pride.
www.thepinknews.com/2025/06/02/f...
www.thepinknews.com/2025/06/02/f...
I was surprised the SC said that you can't ask to see a GRC as I thought that was just folklore. But as the SC based and hinged their judgement on it with their you can't tell between a TW GRC holder, non GRC TW or man because you can't ask to see a GRC skit, pa 202, I guess it's now actual law.
May 21, 2025 at 6:43 AM
I was surprised the SC said that you can't ask to see a GRC as I thought that was just folklore. But as the SC based and hinged their judgement on it with their you can't tell between a TW GRC holder, non GRC TW or man because you can't ask to see a GRC skit, pa 202, I guess it's now actual law.
EHRC used a mother with a 10yr son as an example and said it was permitted as the son wasn't a threat (don't laugh) and it encouraged the mothers participation.
The guidance is shit. We knew that, it's because the law is now shit and unworkable and incompatible with ECHR.
The guidance is shit. We knew that, it's because the law is now shit and unworkable and incompatible with ECHR.
May 21, 2025 at 5:24 AM
EHRC used a mother with a 10yr son as an example and said it was permitted as the son wasn't a threat (don't laugh) and it encouraged the mothers participation.
The guidance is shit. We knew that, it's because the law is now shit and unworkable and incompatible with ECHR.
The guidance is shit. We knew that, it's because the law is now shit and unworkable and incompatible with ECHR.
"every explanation of equality law from the EHRC will be accurate and authoritative"
EHRC do realise for 15 years and until as recently last month they thought and published authoritatively that the EA2010 meant something else, not even they had claimed the law was where the supreme court put it
EHRC do realise for 15 years and until as recently last month they thought and published authoritatively that the EA2010 meant something else, not even they had claimed the law was where the supreme court put it
May 15, 2025 at 9:49 PM
"every explanation of equality law from the EHRC will be accurate and authoritative"
EHRC do realise for 15 years and until as recently last month they thought and published authoritatively that the EA2010 meant something else, not even they had claimed the law was where the supreme court put it
EHRC do realise for 15 years and until as recently last month they thought and published authoritatively that the EA2010 meant something else, not even they had claimed the law was where the supreme court put it
Even worse in the text. One of only five with imposible legal frameworks for gender recognition.
UK, Russia, Belarus, Hungary and Georgia.
UK, Russia, Belarus, Hungary and Georgia.
May 14, 2025 at 8:58 AM
Even worse in the text. One of only five with imposible legal frameworks for gender recognition.
UK, Russia, Belarus, Hungary and Georgia.
UK, Russia, Belarus, Hungary and Georgia.
They ranked us amongst 5 countries with impossible legal frameworks for gender recognition. UK, Russia Hungary Bulgaria Georgia
May 14, 2025 at 8:26 AM
They ranked us amongst 5 countries with impossible legal frameworks for gender recognition. UK, Russia Hungary Bulgaria Georgia
Interesting as my MP was so proud of the Libdems voting against it in the HofC.
Nb "we" in the screenshot didn't include him as he abstained.
And didn't seem worried about human rights of trans people but concerned it was too much bother.
Nb "we" in the screenshot didn't include him as he abstained.
And didn't seem worried about human rights of trans people but concerned it was too much bother.
May 14, 2025 at 8:11 AM
Interesting as my MP was so proud of the Libdems voting against it in the HofC.
Nb "we" in the screenshot didn't include him as he abstained.
And didn't seem worried about human rights of trans people but concerned it was too much bother.
Nb "we" in the screenshot didn't include him as he abstained.
And didn't seem worried about human rights of trans people but concerned it was too much bother.