The top 5 over-emitting countries would be liable to pay more than two thirds of total compensation. And the top 5 low-emitting countries would be entitled to receive more than half. This is compensation for mitigating far more rapidly that would otherwise be required, not grants or loans. 6/

Here’s a short story about who wins and loses from the status quo of our inheritance tax rules - and about, what you might politely call ‘sub-optimal’ journalism🧵

4/5 ‘Groundhog-day’ discussion of incremental tweaks points to the next IPCC report (AR7) guiding policy makers on “actionable solutions” for 1.5°C. Yet by the time AR7 is published they'll be no 1.5°C carbon budget left.
WGIII is set again to favour economic fairytales over physical reality.

A quick thread. If you like stories of the early days of acid house and hellish logging, then buckle up my friends...

An old DJ pal (quite well known, we'll call him 'Steve') was playing a party BITD. Now these were the days, kids, when the nights went long and the pills were strong...

I’d like to do some research. Can plasterers automatically ice cakes well?

Please share for a wider audience.