@lionel2017.bsky.social
Reposted
The top 5 over-emitting countries would be liable to pay more than two thirds of total compensation. And the top 5 low-emitting countries would be entitled to receive more than half. This is compensation for mitigating far more rapidly that would otherwise be required, not grants or loans. 6/
November 24, 2024 at 10:42 PM
The top 5 over-emitting countries would be liable to pay more than two thirds of total compensation. And the top 5 low-emitting countries would be entitled to receive more than half. This is compensation for mitigating far more rapidly that would otherwise be required, not grants or loans. 6/
Reposted
4/5 ‘Groundhog-day’ discussion of incremental tweaks points to the next IPCC report (AR7) guiding policy makers on “actionable solutions” for 1.5°C. Yet by the time AR7 is published they'll be no 1.5°C carbon budget left.
WGIII is set again to favour economic fairytales over physical reality.
WGIII is set again to favour economic fairytales over physical reality.
November 22, 2024 at 10:01 AM
4/5 ‘Groundhog-day’ discussion of incremental tweaks points to the next IPCC report (AR7) guiding policy makers on “actionable solutions” for 1.5°C. Yet by the time AR7 is published they'll be no 1.5°C carbon budget left.
WGIII is set again to favour economic fairytales over physical reality.
WGIII is set again to favour economic fairytales over physical reality.
